You're right on the judges thing, but the rest are debatable. Since this is a gun board, I'll skip right to number 5. Rudy Guiliani believes Congress should pass a law saying we must show a need for a handgun before owning one. I'm not sure where he believes Congress gets that power, but I'm assuming it is from the commerce clause, so Rudy has the usual leftistgungrabber/rightwingdrugwarrior understanding of that authority. Even if we assume Hillary has some position I would like even less, from a constitutional perspective, explain how Rudy is better than Hillary on guns. Seems to me that they have the same understanding of the commerce clause, and a view of policy which is at least similar.Stage2 said:1) judges
2) taxes
3) healthcare
4) property rights
5) gun rights
Guliani and Thompson and pretty much any other republican are far better than hillary on these issues from a constitutional perspective.
Last edited: