As do I, with the caveat (that he stressed repeatedly) that such behavior is perilous. I applaud pretty much anybody who's willing to stand up to the nanny-state when the nanny-state is breaking their own laws.
And yet you seemed to have once again missed the point. In a world of ignorant voters who don't pay attention, there are no caveats. Its all or none. From that interview, Paul supports the Brown. The browns will either die or go to jail. Paul is inextricably linked to them.
This business about the nanny state means nothing becaue 80% of americans don't even know what that means. All they see is someone saying "yay for the Browns". When it all melts down they are going to see Paul as a kook because he supported criminals.
You Paul guys don't seem to get the fact that you need to win an election to be president. When most of the voters are sheep guess who you have to win over to be elected. The intelligent folks are probably going to vote for you already. Its the sheep you have to play to otherwise its no dice.
Paul has no idea how to do this, and as such he can't win.