Darker Loaf
New member
So, I know I will get struck down from on high, but I will say this:
As new revolver owner, I've experienced far more problems with my 986 than any other centerfire handgun I've had experience with other than a EAA Match Witness in 10mm.
This makes me fully doubt the old adage: "Revolvers will work when all else fails."
Yes, many of you may say, "Oh this is because you are shooting a 9mm revolver and a new-production one at that!" This certainly could be true, and I will give you that. Or you may say, "If it misfires, then you can just pull the trigger again!" Ok, fine yes, that is a way of solving the problem.
But know this! Kahrs are much maligned (even by myself, who has sold 2 polymer Kahrs to date with reliability issues), but yet, my Kahr K9 has run with literally zero malfunctions to date... [pause for doubters] Know this! I've own VERY few guns that have had zero reliability issues. Heck, one of my favorite guns, a XD V-10 Service Length 9mm, has had scores of reliability issues... but to it's credit I've put 10,000's of rounds through the gun. I could make it run with a non-captured spring and a solid guide rod with the SPRING IN BACKWARDS!!! [It did not run well like this, but it ran goddamnit!]
But my concerns are not generated from the fact that this gun is a 9mm handgun. No, my concerns are from the fact that I've run the gun multiple times, until MANY screws have backed out causing a variety of functioning problems!
Granted, I love my 986, and I'd still recommend the gun. I shoot my 986 better than any other centerfire handgun than I have ever shot. However, I've seen about 4-5 important screws, usually blue-locktighted, sometimes even red--from factory, back out with vigorous firing. This would not be as troubling, but I know that I am not a avid revolver shooter. I've yet to break the 1,000 round mark (I'm pretty sure) with my gun. I've had the sight assembly shake loose. I've had the screw that retains slide-plate that retains the internals (which was red-loctited) almost fully back out. I've had the main spring tensioning screw back out twice within mere 100's of rounds, causing scores of light primers strikes to the point where 1-2 per 7 round clip would not fire.
So, my question to you is: How possibly are revolvers (if you actually shoot them frequently) more reliable than good (read as "service") semi-autos?
My concern is that any good revolver has screws which are constantly under vibration and heat that back out which cause the guns to fail. Barring idiocy (such as putting in the return spring in backwards), I've had no such maintenance issues in semi-autos. But it seems you have to glue a revolvers components in place, and even red locktight will fail you if you run a gun with enough rapidity and frequency, as I've had factory red-locktighted screw back out on me.
Why don't revolvers use pins instead in crucial areas such as the main spring???
Answer me, TFL!
I feel like someone told me that Santa Claus doesn't exist, again.
As new revolver owner, I've experienced far more problems with my 986 than any other centerfire handgun I've had experience with other than a EAA Match Witness in 10mm.
This makes me fully doubt the old adage: "Revolvers will work when all else fails."
Yes, many of you may say, "Oh this is because you are shooting a 9mm revolver and a new-production one at that!" This certainly could be true, and I will give you that. Or you may say, "If it misfires, then you can just pull the trigger again!" Ok, fine yes, that is a way of solving the problem.
But know this! Kahrs are much maligned (even by myself, who has sold 2 polymer Kahrs to date with reliability issues), but yet, my Kahr K9 has run with literally zero malfunctions to date... [pause for doubters] Know this! I've own VERY few guns that have had zero reliability issues. Heck, one of my favorite guns, a XD V-10 Service Length 9mm, has had scores of reliability issues... but to it's credit I've put 10,000's of rounds through the gun. I could make it run with a non-captured spring and a solid guide rod with the SPRING IN BACKWARDS!!! [It did not run well like this, but it ran goddamnit!]
But my concerns are not generated from the fact that this gun is a 9mm handgun. No, my concerns are from the fact that I've run the gun multiple times, until MANY screws have backed out causing a variety of functioning problems!
Granted, I love my 986, and I'd still recommend the gun. I shoot my 986 better than any other centerfire handgun than I have ever shot. However, I've seen about 4-5 important screws, usually blue-locktighted, sometimes even red--from factory, back out with vigorous firing. This would not be as troubling, but I know that I am not a avid revolver shooter. I've yet to break the 1,000 round mark (I'm pretty sure) with my gun. I've had the sight assembly shake loose. I've had the screw that retains slide-plate that retains the internals (which was red-loctited) almost fully back out. I've had the main spring tensioning screw back out twice within mere 100's of rounds, causing scores of light primers strikes to the point where 1-2 per 7 round clip would not fire.
So, my question to you is: How possibly are revolvers (if you actually shoot them frequently) more reliable than good (read as "service") semi-autos?
My concern is that any good revolver has screws which are constantly under vibration and heat that back out which cause the guns to fail. Barring idiocy (such as putting in the return spring in backwards), I've had no such maintenance issues in semi-autos. But it seems you have to glue a revolvers components in place, and even red locktight will fail you if you run a gun with enough rapidity and frequency, as I've had factory red-locktighted screw back out on me.
Why don't revolvers use pins instead in crucial areas such as the main spring???
Answer me, TFL!
I feel like someone told me that Santa Claus doesn't exist, again.
Last edited: