zincwarrior said:Again you seem to not understand the lack of relationship between the Bundys and their tax/lease dispute with the BLM and arson.
Zinc, you been offered a more detailed explanation, but prefer to simply re-assert your position. I don't think this is because you are stupid.
I can describe the relationship to as I already have, but that puts you back at denying having read something you just read. You don't have to like the relationship or any of the characters involved. You can even retain your belief that the underlying land rights dispute is "ridiculous and insane", clearly a position into which you've invested much reflection.
However, you have read a description of the common issues between the Bundys (the same issues present in the Cliven Bundy episode a couple of years ago), the Hammonds and their incarceration that gave rise to the protest and occupation. If they weren't related in any way, no one could have described that relationship for you.
See?