Jimbob
In my previous life, working on dairy farms in PA, I killed thousands of groundhogs with all manner of firearms. From my experience, on a 15-18 pound groundhog, a .22 LR is a 50 yard cartridge and requires a head shot to anchor a big groundhog. With a chest shot with the 22lr, the groundhog would more often than not make it into his hole. It was most likely dead within a minute or two, but it does not anchor them.
With the .22 WMR 40 grain hollow point, a chest shot is much more dramatic, if the groundhog moves, he does not go very far, usually DRT. I consider the .22 WMR a 100 yard groundhog round in an accurate rifle.
I am not arguing your point about economy, I handload for a myriad of cartridges, and agree with the cost factor. However, I do NOT agree that the 22 WMR offers very little extra performance, I have used both enough to know better.
What I like about the 22 WMR is the delightful rifles it as chambered in, like my 9422
In my previous life, working on dairy farms in PA, I killed thousands of groundhogs with all manner of firearms. From my experience, on a 15-18 pound groundhog, a .22 LR is a 50 yard cartridge and requires a head shot to anchor a big groundhog. With a chest shot with the 22lr, the groundhog would more often than not make it into his hole. It was most likely dead within a minute or two, but it does not anchor them.
With the .22 WMR 40 grain hollow point, a chest shot is much more dramatic, if the groundhog moves, he does not go very far, usually DRT. I consider the .22 WMR a 100 yard groundhog round in an accurate rifle.
I am not arguing your point about economy, I handload for a myriad of cartridges, and agree with the cost factor. However, I do NOT agree that the 22 WMR offers very little extra performance, I have used both enough to know better.
What I like about the 22 WMR is the delightful rifles it as chambered in, like my 9422
Last edited: