Regal Cinemas Ban Carrying of Guns

I guess you people are right, i'm going to strap on my 357 and load up my mossberg pump so i can take my family to the movies and get a pizza safely tonight.
Regal dosen't own our movie house.
It's the illegals hanging around out in the parking lot that you people have got me thinking about. lol


I want to keep guns as i feel it is my right, not because the country is so unsafe that i have to carry them when i take my family out.
 
Once again, how can a property owner claim the right to control his property and not claim the responsibility for what happens there?

Remove my ability to defend myself, and you become responsible for my safety.

As a side note, if the government does the same thing, who then defends me from it?

I carry a gun for the same reasons I have auto insurance, a smoke detector, a fire extinguisher and a spare tire. I choose to be ready and able to take care of myself, instead of depending on the kindness of strangers.
 
Fact/Premise #1. Property owner has right to do whatever he/she/it damn well pleases, as you say. No argument there! They are 100% free to post the "stupid signs" (no guns allowed signs - only stupid people put them up and only stupid people obey them). Now, you stop here on Step 1 without following through and thinking of the ramifications. But the analysis *doesn't end here*!
Click to expand...

Only stupid people put up a no guns allowed sigh? Really....interesting view of life

Fact/Premise #2. *IFF* and when Fact #1 happens, and we do NOTHING, the state of affairs becomes such that the stupid signs spread like a cancer and eventually they are everywhere - this conditions the sheeple to think "guns are bad, period" - not "guns might help save lives". This results in people voting for politicians who agree that "guns are bad", not "guns can be good".
Click to expand...

Nothing is more specious than post hoc ergo propter hoc logic. Your use of the term sheeple renders your reasoning even more flawed, since it is apparent it is done in a biased fashion

Fact/Premise #3. *IFF* and when, on the other hand, Fact #1 happens, and we cause a change in their policy, by hitting them in their pocketbooks with a boycott - something which is incredibly EASY to do, since all businesses have competitors - and that causes them to remove said stupid signs and quit conditioning the sheeple to think guns are bad. We have to *raise the cost* of putting up stupid signs (our boycott) ABOVE the cost of not having stupid signs (increased insurance premiums). This results in better pols and better laws and more safety for all of us.
Click to expand...

More post hoc ergo propter hoc

WildbutheysomefolksarealwaysgonnabethatwayAlaska
 
"I want to keep guns as i feel it is my right, not because the country is so unsafe that i have to carry them when i take my family out."

I want to carry my gun, as it is my right. I carry my gun when I take my family out. If you choose not to, fine, but you're on the other side if you would take away my right to protect myself and my family.

I wholeheartedly believe that any business can post signs to keep me out. No problem. I just take my gun and my money elsewhere.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top