cloudcroft
New member
Socrates,
I used to carry NAAs Mini Revolvers (.22LR and .22MAG versions) until I wised up about them (via personal experience with the .22MAG gun). And since you should practice with them A LOT to get good with them, the more you practice the more you're setting up one of the internal parts -- like the brittle hammer spring -- to fail due to wear-and-tear of regular practice sessions. I don't care for guns that won't hold up being used.
As for the Beretta 3032 inox, sure, it's "chunky" but very well made and solidly built, so personally, I don't find it being "chunky" any negative whatsoever. And my Tomcat never malfunctioned in any way (I used Aguila 71-grain FMJs in it, which met the prescribed "power level" ammo the Beretta 3032 Owners Manual recommended be used). I had NO interest is using any hot .32ACP ammo as some people insist on doing with the 3032 (in spite of instructions to the contrary, which I see as abusing a gun and I won't do that), since gelatin ballistics results were ALMOST IDENTICAL (maybe an inch of penetration difference, if that) for any of the .32 FMJs...so I stuck to the lower-powered stuff as the manual stated...made it easy on the gun AND gave me the penetration I needed. Win-win.
Plus, being a small gun with no barrel protruding -- and being firmly held in one's hand -- it would be REAL hard for some assailant to grab the gun and get any leverage at all to pry it OUT of your hand...especially when you're pulling the trigger. ;-)
Unlike 50 years ago (or more), nowadays there are few currently-produced .22LR autos. But of the few there are, I go with Beretta. And the tip-up barrels are great to check the chamber, and for people who have trouble (from arthritis or whatever) racking a slide.
As for the .32ACP, there are a number of choices available, but I still went with Beretta partly because I had a Beretta 21A and the 3032 works the VERY SAME WAY...so I had two guns that handled/functioned THE SAME so my handling experience with the 21A easliy transferred to the 3032. No relearning/operating a different gun design, especially under stress.
But again, I do not like DAOs so that ruled out lots of other small .32ACP guns. I prefer SA because these guns are more accurate than most people can shoot, but the way to realize said accuracy is via SA, not DA...and if you need to take a longer shot -- for whatever reason -- SA is the best choice for getting hits at longer ranges. For me, DA is (1) a safety and (2) the FIRST shot out of my pocket if I need to "rush" the gun into use. Otherwise, I cock the hammer and do it all SA.
Beretta makes quality guns, but I'm not trying to convince anyone of that or, to buy a Beretta...I'm just stating my $20 worth here.
-- John D.
I used to carry NAAs Mini Revolvers (.22LR and .22MAG versions) until I wised up about them (via personal experience with the .22MAG gun). And since you should practice with them A LOT to get good with them, the more you practice the more you're setting up one of the internal parts -- like the brittle hammer spring -- to fail due to wear-and-tear of regular practice sessions. I don't care for guns that won't hold up being used.
As for the Beretta 3032 inox, sure, it's "chunky" but very well made and solidly built, so personally, I don't find it being "chunky" any negative whatsoever. And my Tomcat never malfunctioned in any way (I used Aguila 71-grain FMJs in it, which met the prescribed "power level" ammo the Beretta 3032 Owners Manual recommended be used). I had NO interest is using any hot .32ACP ammo as some people insist on doing with the 3032 (in spite of instructions to the contrary, which I see as abusing a gun and I won't do that), since gelatin ballistics results were ALMOST IDENTICAL (maybe an inch of penetration difference, if that) for any of the .32 FMJs...so I stuck to the lower-powered stuff as the manual stated...made it easy on the gun AND gave me the penetration I needed. Win-win.
Plus, being a small gun with no barrel protruding -- and being firmly held in one's hand -- it would be REAL hard for some assailant to grab the gun and get any leverage at all to pry it OUT of your hand...especially when you're pulling the trigger. ;-)
Unlike 50 years ago (or more), nowadays there are few currently-produced .22LR autos. But of the few there are, I go with Beretta. And the tip-up barrels are great to check the chamber, and for people who have trouble (from arthritis or whatever) racking a slide.
As for the .32ACP, there are a number of choices available, but I still went with Beretta partly because I had a Beretta 21A and the 3032 works the VERY SAME WAY...so I had two guns that handled/functioned THE SAME so my handling experience with the 21A easliy transferred to the 3032. No relearning/operating a different gun design, especially under stress.
But again, I do not like DAOs so that ruled out lots of other small .32ACP guns. I prefer SA because these guns are more accurate than most people can shoot, but the way to realize said accuracy is via SA, not DA...and if you need to take a longer shot -- for whatever reason -- SA is the best choice for getting hits at longer ranges. For me, DA is (1) a safety and (2) the FIRST shot out of my pocket if I need to "rush" the gun into use. Otherwise, I cock the hammer and do it all SA.
Beretta makes quality guns, but I'm not trying to convince anyone of that or, to buy a Beretta...I'm just stating my $20 worth here.
-- John D.