Heck, for all you know Kate might be an anti-gun journalist who is writing an article about how easy it is to join a gun forum, ask for details on how to commit a murder and then is inundated with information freely given without so much as a question about her motives.
But then I tend to be paranoid.
I don't mind if it's some anti-gun journalist, if it is hopefully they'd tell the whole story and not just snippets. If it's someone looking to commit a crime, they just created such a big electronic trail that they'd nearly inevitably get caught.
Don't say it.I just figured out who the character is that took one to the heart.
An anti-gun journalist? Really?
Second, no one is going to sell a gun to a sixteen year old girl. And I have no underground or black market connections, so I couldn't obtain one illegally.
Thirdly, if I am to be honest, you all are helping me commit a crime. It's just a fictional crime in a fictional book.
My motives include:
I am not a gun expert, so I need information from people whose knowledge of weapons surpasses my own.
I want my book to be realistic, so details are important.
The internet is not always a reliable source of information, and a lot of what I looked up contradicted itself.
If I were to be commiting a crime, why would I join a forum where all of it could be traced?
And of course every murderer pretends to be a sixteen year old girl to obtain info on firearms. C'mon, people.
Patricia Cornwell. Kathy Reichs. Authors of forensic thrillers where things such as bullet velocity, blood spatter, and damage done to the body are important, almost crucial, to the story.
Michael Palmer. Robin Cook. Authors of medical thrillers where things such as how the bullet enters the body, damage done, and blood loss are all important to the story.
And don't assume that because I'm a woman I write chick literature for old women.
Thanks to those who helped and did not overanalyze.