Uncle Buck
New member
When I was at Guantanamo we had an iguana that hung out behind the chow hall. He was some sort of pet and when the workers would take a break, they would bring food out to it.
One day I was talking with some of the refugees and they had roasted an iguana. I asked where they got it and they said from the chow hall. The American GI's were mad as hell about their pet being eaten, but it actually tasted pretty good.
I understand the need for the Florida Department of Wildlife, or Wildlife Management, or Conservation Department or what-ever D) they want to call themselves, to gather info on a non-native species. But it seems to me that if the ultimate goal is eradication of these species, then there should be a happy medium between gathering information and eradication.
Requiring people who hunt the wildlife management areas to have permits and such seems counterproductive in the removal of these species. Why not have a voluntary program in which people report the location of the animal and stomach contents? There would be enough volunteers. Most hunters like to brag about what they have taken.
As far as folks letting these species go, we have the same thing here in Missouri. I worked with a lady who had some kind of snake (Python or boa constrictor) that was six feet long. She took it to the wildlife conservation area and let it go because it was to big for her apartment. I doubt it could survive the winter here, but what about the havoc it could cause before it died?
These critters also carry diseases that can be spread to other animals.
One day I was talking with some of the refugees and they had roasted an iguana. I asked where they got it and they said from the chow hall. The American GI's were mad as hell about their pet being eaten, but it actually tasted pretty good.
I understand the need for the Florida Department of Wildlife, or Wildlife Management, or Conservation Department or what-ever D) they want to call themselves, to gather info on a non-native species. But it seems to me that if the ultimate goal is eradication of these species, then there should be a happy medium between gathering information and eradication.
Requiring people who hunt the wildlife management areas to have permits and such seems counterproductive in the removal of these species. Why not have a voluntary program in which people report the location of the animal and stomach contents? There would be enough volunteers. Most hunters like to brag about what they have taken.
As far as folks letting these species go, we have the same thing here in Missouri. I worked with a lady who had some kind of snake (Python or boa constrictor) that was six feet long. She took it to the wildlife conservation area and let it go because it was to big for her apartment. I doubt it could survive the winter here, but what about the havoc it could cause before it died?
These critters also carry diseases that can be spread to other animals.