Witness testimony as well as that of the person that fired the three shots after the Sgt. dispatched the deceased as described in various news sources shows that the deceased used the muzzle of his AK47 to "roll your window down" or so they stated. That means an Afgahnistan Vet (as reported) was muzzle swept by the deceased.
The person that fired the three shots at the Sgt. after he engaged the deceased was questioned and admitted his role to the police (reported by P.D. and the local news).
This won't even go to the Grand Jury. In this dynamic situation, in light of the Sgt.'s actions at large and the second shooters testimony, as well as the video of the deceased hours before hand establishing frame of mind, the D.A. won't touch this at all. The Veteran Sgt. / Uber driver suffers legal bills and not much else.
The person that fired the three shots at the Sgt. after he engaged the deceased was questioned and admitted his role to the police (reported by P.D. and the local news).
This won't even go to the Grand Jury. In this dynamic situation, in light of the Sgt.'s actions at large and the second shooters testimony, as well as the video of the deceased hours before hand establishing frame of mind, the D.A. won't touch this at all. The Veteran Sgt. / Uber driver suffers legal bills and not much else.