OldMarksman
Staff
Posted by mavracer:
I suggest that if the conclusion in the report, which certainly does seem counterintuitive to lay persons, were really not supportable, that it would have by now been challenged by a person or person with a scientific basis for doing so.
We are still waiting for something from you to substantiate your accusation that the FBI "and LEO" lied.
At some point, I should think that deep enough is deep enough, and that once that point has been reached, more holes would be the better objective....as then is now larger more powerful rounds still make larger and deeper holes. And larger/deeper increase the odds of turning timers into switches and shorting the amount of time on timers.
Not exactly. You can accept having a deer run for ten or twenty feet before dropping.[In response to "your objective is to drop the game reasonably quickly"] As quickly as possible, so even if the motives are different the objective is the same.
Nothing personal about it. A report from well-researched and critically reviewed scientific study contains a conclusion, and you have stated, without offering any objective reason whatsoever, that the conclusion is incorrect.[In response to "Ah, the voice of a true scientific expert"] Ah when your argument falls flat resort to personal attacks.
I suggest that if the conclusion in the report, which certainly does seem counterintuitive to lay persons, were really not supportable, that it would have by now been challenged by a person or person with a scientific basis for doing so.
We are still waiting for something from you to substantiate your accusation that the FBI "and LEO" lied.