Opinion of Smith & Wesson?

What's your opinion of Smith & Wesson?

  • Own or owned one, loved it

    Votes: 222 81.6%
  • Own or owned one, disliked it

    Votes: 1 0.4%
  • Own or owned one, pretty neutral view of them

    Votes: 16 5.9%
  • Never owned one, loved it

    Votes: 6 2.2%
  • Never owned one, don't like them

    Votes: 2 0.7%
  • Never owned one, pretty neutral view of them

    Votes: 12 4.4%
  • My CC gun is a S&W, trust my life with it

    Votes: 2 0.7%
  • Good plinking gun but wouldn't CC it

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • All my guns are S&W and I love them all!! Who needs another brand?

    Votes: 7 2.6%
  • Horrible experiences! Would never.. ever.. touch one again.

    Votes: 4 1.5%

  • Total voters
    272
  • Poll closed .
I like the old ones...

Webley5 makes valid points about the current ownership of S&W, but I'm still not happy with the current products.

I like real S&W revolvers and a couple of autopistols.

Real S&W revolvers have barrels held in place by friction pins, firing pins mounted on hammers, one piece barrels, no pointless barrel underlugs, mostly steel frames and a complete lack of internally mounted, cater-to-the-stupid, pinhead safety locks.

When they start making real revolvers again, I'll buy another one. I'd love a new version of the Second Model Hand Ejector - made the way they're supposed to be made.

The Model 41 target pistol is still made fairly well, unless there's a lock on that now, as well. I have a Model 52 that is a joy to shoot. They don't make that at all any more, of course. Instead they have a variant in 9x19. It's stainless steel only, I believe. The Model 39 is a historical piece and a suitable arm for self-defense, save the marginal caliber. I'll buy one when I can find one I can afford. I'd buy a new one - if the frame were still the alloy version, the slide blued and no chicken plucking lock.

Sadly, modern S&W revolvers are just cheap knock-offs of S&W revolvers.
 
No offense to anybody, but S&W and Taurus are in different stratospheres in terms of quality, so you should not expect a similar polling outcome. I only buy pre-lock S&W though.
 
I didn't figure my opinion and experience yesterday deserved it's own thread, so I'll put it here.

I'm a big fan of S&W, I own five currently and I hope to own more. I've got four revolvers-- 3 K-frames, one L-frame, and a 3rd Gen semi-auto.

Yesterday I was in a store that had a manufacturer's show going on. Company reps from Taurus, Remington, Winchester, Leupold, Savage and Smith & Wesson all had representatives.

So I chatted with the S&W guy. Apparently, the best I could tell, he knew neither his former nor his current product line as well as I did. When I asked him if the frame size of the .40 and the .45 cal M&P's were the same, he looked in the brochure and said, "I don't know, I wonder if it's in here?"

He also didn't seem to know what the other current gun makers are selling.

He seemed friendly enough, but I guess if you fit the shirt that has the logo on it, you too can be a Smith & Wesson factory rep. :confused: Either that or they just send the least valuable guy they have to do the little weekend junket to Cornfield, Ohio and save the real reps for the bigger shows.
 
I would say the fact that you can readily purchase a 40 year old S&W revolver that functions as well as one created out of the factory yesterday (as long as it's been well-maintenanced) pretty much testifies to their quality.
 
Back
Top