Wil Terry
As for all of you other whiners, you are a rude bunch of pissants who should have had the common courtesy to take your combined bellyaching to a different place.
No, YOU should have the common courtesy to take ruger praising to a forum called the "We Like Guns But Want To Actively Participate in Obliterating Gun Rights By Buying From the Principal Gun Company Architect of Gun Bans" Forum, not this one, where many people actually support the RKBA.
This thread was started to find out how the new SA sixgun is being received and that has nothing to do with you or your whining,
Wrong. It most certainly does. Anything pro Ruger is always going to be met with the other side presented. Always. So get used to it or hit the road. I'm entitled to my .02 just like anyone else, and so are all the other Ruger boycotters.
nor do anyone of us here ever give a damn whether you ever buy a gun from any gun company, RUGER included.
Who's "us", because it appears you're in the minority. And I'm in fact "here" and I do care, as does Joab. So you're wrong on that count as well.
To be even blunter, nobody here cares a hoot in hell what rude nincomepoops like you think about anything.
I wasn't rude at all. I just pointed out a political fact. And you're mistaken. Many do care, including notably joab and many others - do you purport to speak for ALL lurkers? If anything, the only rudeness occuring is people like you money into the pockets of a company that urges Congress to pass gun bans, which in turn infringes MY right to own a firearm - that's extraordinarily rude, if you ask me.
Now go away and do your whining elsewhere as you are boring the rest of to no end.
Wishful thinking. Bottom line: There is NO SEPARATING the two (the guns and the politics) - they're inescapably tied, and no discussion of Ruger's (admittedly fine) products is EVER complete without mention of their politics,, at least in passing (lest some wayward newb be led to believe they're an OK company to buy from, and lest hardened sellouts like yourself forget that you're a hardened sellout). And you don't sound bored - you sound quite excited - this is a good thing. Any other questions or incorrect statements you want me to correct?
I'll note right here that the name-calling you just engaged in (pissants and nincompoops) is against forum policy as an ad hominem attack, and also does not further your "argument", if that's what you want to call your rant. In contrast, I've broken no forum policies. Have a nice thread.
Your thread is only being "ruined", or interfered with, to the extent that others have hurt it by trying to defend Ruger's politics, when what they should have done is discussed the guns, and ignored my initial post, if they didn't want it to be discussed further. But they chose to discuss it further. So they're gonna get smacked down when they speak deceptions, untruths, and defenses of Ruger's politics. I'd have been perfectly happy with only the initial post had your ruger-loving "friends" (Wil Terry, tulsamal, and 461) not perpetuated the discussion. But they CHOSE to keep discussing it instead. So they should keep that in mind for the next time, and maybe they'll save themselves being exposed to such a great extent on their sellout status.
