Newt Gingrich considers White House bid.

PsychoSword

Moderator
Anybody else that saw this coming ten miles away? Another CFR/Trilateral Commission/Bilderberg member and polarizing figure. Will it be the NWO tool Arnold and NWO member Gingrich vying for the GOP nomination come next election? Maybe they just plan on having Arnold there to take the spotlight off of real issues???
 
What an idea!

As if there were not already enough absurdity in American politics....
I welcome Old Newtser to the race. One can never have too much comedy material.
 
I read in 'World News and Conspiracy Daily' that 'space alien grizzly bears' are also conspiring to yank the levers of power away from the stupid, lazy and ever so contemptable citizenry of the US. The groundwork has been being laid for years, beginning with the Teddy bear. They then moved their operations to Siberia and became 'the russian bear'. The movement continued with such media manipulation as Dancing Bear, Yogi and Boo Boo Bear, Gentle Ben, Smokey the bear, Goldilocks (the Jewish connection) and the Three Bears, the Berenstein Bears, Bears on Ice, bears in the circus, pandas, koalas and their ilk. There are even stores called 'Build-a-Bear' where shoppers can create your own bear. Sounds like the Bildeburger connection to me.

Reports also indicate that this conspiracy even goes into the realm of professional sports...naming teams after these ursine usurpers in order to make gullible Americans feel safe and secure in the presence of bears and with 'the universal Bear agenda'. Look for a spike in honey and salmon futures as well as an alarming increase in hulking, hairy, foul breathed creatures in the malls, schools, places of worship and the electronic media. Soon, they will control the entire US.

And none of us can do a damned thing about it. We're doomed.


Arnold Schwarzenegger, my fat, hairy backside! :)
 
That was pretty funny gburner. Unfortunately you believe that the people who run the world are the same ones that the mainstream media tell us do. That's your choice if you want to stay asleep.

Believe it or not, I'm not a NAZI nor do I think there's a "Zionist Conspiracy" nor do I wear a "Death to ZOG" T-shirt. You probably believe that the Bilderberg Group is just a social club for geriatric old men who discuss their golf scores.

Yeah, the man who brought the 94 gun ban to Clinton's desk; I wouldn't vote for him, much as I like *some* of his ideas.

They all play for the same team.
 
Yeah, the man who brought the 94 gun ban to Clinton's desk; I wouldn't vote for him, much as I like *some* of his ideas.

How in the world is Newt Gingrich responsible for the 1994 gun ban that Clinton signed?
 
There ya go again, makin' assumptions about what I do and don't believe; where I do and don't get my information. It's so hard having a coherent discussion with you folks when you just won't pay attention. Gosh Almighty, did I say or even insinuate that you are a Nazi? I don't think so. Me thinks you doth protest too much. Lots of stuff gets heaped at the feet of the Bilderbergers (as well as the Masons, the Jews, the Mormons, the Jesuits, voodoo zombies, satanists, druids, bigfoot, aliens, chupacabra, mummy curses, the Hope diamond, the Bermuda triangle...well, you get the picture) its just natural that they are grist for the conspiracy mill. As for my state of consciousness, opinions vary but it as no bearing on your wild theories, paraniod speculation and generally defeatist attitude about America and Americans.
 
Newt and I had a contract once. Well, I didn't exactly have one. But he had one, but I forget whom it was with. I think he did something with it, but I forget what. I'm sure he is no worse today than he was then. He'd make just as incompetent a president as he did a joker, I mean speaker, of the house.
 
Because you take the old route of painting me as someone who thinks it's all just a Jewish conspiracy even if just to poke fun at me.

What is "defeatist about my attitude toward America and Americans?" America is pretty much the last bastion of hope. We're the only ones who still have guns, we're the only ones who still have some semblance of a Bill of Rights. Why do you think the globalists have been going after us so badly? Americans have been manipulated for far too long.

Do you really believe that Republicans are any different than Democrats?
Gun control, wide open borders, high taxes, War on some Drugs, arming our enemies, transferring high technology to China and North Korea....and a dozen other places that would like to nuke us..

And let me ask you, what do you know about the Federal Reserve? Also, do you actually believe that Bush is a Christian?

You may or may not find this short article interesting:

http://www.eagleforum.org/educate/washington/happened.html
 
I wonder how many people in this country between the age of 14 and 34 have even heard of Newt Gingrich. ;)
 
What is "defeatist about my attitude toward America and Americans?" America is pretty much the last bastion of hope. We're the only ones who still have guns, we're the only ones who still have some semblance of a Bill of Rights. Why do you think the globalists have been going after us so badly? Americans have been manipulated for far too long.
Whoa I actually agreed with you on that one
Do you really believe that Republicans are any different than Democrats?
Gun control, wide open borders, high taxes, War on some Drugs, arming our enemies, transferring high technology to China and North Korea....and a dozen other places that would like to nuke us..
We really only have 2 major parties to vote for unfortuntly but hey run for president for these issues and you will get my vote. what do ya say?
 
You guys really need to try some of that new type aluminum foil Reynolds makes. The non stick side is much more comfortable against your scalp.

Newt Gingrich....who did he play for again :confused:
 
Bush is a fraud. Whether he's a Christian or not is a tedious question that is of little or no significance to me. Organized religion is a fraud, as well. ymmv

In their current incarnation, there is no difference between mainstream reps and dems (except that the dems seem to play that loathsome, whining victim card at every opportunity). This was not the case as recently as Reagan's first term when the difference between them was as night and day

Never said that you believed that the Jews were behind anything.

Your postings seem to me to be defeatist because they deal in large part with global domination scenarios that are already a done deal and leave America/Americans under the thumb of some uber collection of financial barons...and there's nothing we can do about it.

Gingrich played for the Bears. hhhmmmmmm.

btw...I read the article, have read it previously. I'm not sure that I understand your point in calling my attention to it.
 
How in the world is Newt Gingrich responsible for the 1994 gun ban that Clinton signed?

I believe he was speaker of the house in 1994, or at least minority leader, and voted along with most of the Congress, for the gun ban which then went to Clinton for signing, and became law. I could be wrong, however. I forget now whether Dems or Repubs controlled the House from 92 to 94. I know the repubs controlled both houses 94-96..... I'm 98% that regardless of whether Repubs or Dems actually controlled the Congress when it passed, that Mr. Gingrich himself in fact voted in favor of the gun ban, and I'm pretty sure that when casting said vote, he was his party's leader in the house, either as speaker or minority leader. Point being, had he LED his party to vote against it, it would never have reached clintoon's desk and become law.

OK, Tom Foley was the House Speaker, not Gingrich, and the ban passed the House very narrowly, 216-214....still looking for the verification that Newt was minority leader and voted for the ban....

Here we go:

www.gunowners.org
Oct. 1994

Gun Ban Passes as Part of Crime Bill,
But not without a fight

-- GOA and friends almost hand Clinton a "stunning defeat"

Gun owners came close to winning a stunning upset in August. On August 11, Representatives voted to prevent the crime bill, with its ban on more than 180 semi-automatic firearms, from being debated on the House floor. Newspapers across the country were labeling the August 11 vote a "stunning defeat" for President Clinton. Rep. Charles Schumer (D-NY) was saying the crime bill was dead for the year.

But then key Republicans -- 46 in the House and seven in the Senate-- broke ranks to help the Democratic leadership resuscitate the crime bill. Many of these Republicans worked around-the-clock to forge a "compromise" crime bill -- a compromise which still contained billions of dollars in pork, a ban on several types of semi-autos and a ban on magazines over 10 rounds. These Republicans handed President Clinton a major victory, and in the end, succeeded in snatching defeat from the jaws of victory.


Clearly, Clinton nearly staked his entire presidency on passage of the crime bill. He pushed hard to pass the bill, making promises and twisting arms to get the necessary votes. But Gun Owners of America worked feverishly in the weeks leading up to the vote to exert as much counter-pressure as possible on wavering legislators. GOA staff appeared on more than 150 radio talk shows in 49 states, urging listeners to call their legislators in opposition to the crime bill and gun ban.

Moreover, GOA issued alerts to our members by fax, by computer bulletin board and by mail. GOA also conducted phone calls into certain key legislative districts, and made personal contact with Representatives and staff on Capitol Hill.

All these efforts were definitely noticed in Washington, D.C. Pro-gun Rep. Rod Grams (R-MN) said that, "Gun Owners of America was instrumental in mobilizing the grassroots to fight the crime bill. They generated a massive phone and fax campaign into the Congress."

While the grassroots response was appreciated by Grams and other pro-gun legislators, it was a bit overwhelming for many anti-gun legislators:

* Representative Bill Hefner (D-NC) was very outspoken about the heat he was receiving from GOA members. When lobbyists for the Law Enforcement Alliance of America were in his office speaking against the crime bill, Mr. Hefner went into a tirade, complaining very loudly about the pressure GOA was putting on him.

* Anti-gun Rep. Vic Fazio (D-CA) also attacked GOA as a force that was 'intimidating' legislators. During debate on the House floor on August 11, Fazio lauded those legislators who, in his view, were willing to stand up "courageously against the Gun Owners of America" and against the opposition of the NRA.

In the end, the pressure was almost able to counteract the pressure coming from President Clinton. The Associated Press reported on August 9 that while some Representatives were being persuaded to support the crime bill, "others in favor of it were being pulled back by gun control opponents [and] persuaded to vote against it."

Rep. Gene Green (D-TX) is a typical example of someone who came under intense heat. While he voted against gun owners in August, the pressure from gun owners made it a difficult decision for him. Press reports had indicated that Green was being pressured by powerful Democratic legislators -- like Rep. Jack Brooks of Texas -- to vote in favor of the crime bill.

One Texas paper stated Green was "being inundated with calls from gun owners urging him to block the assault weapons ban." As a result, Green was telling supporters of the crime bill -- like Brooks -- that it would be hard for him to support the bill. After all, he said, "the people against the assault rifle ban are so vocal and so strong."

What follows is a brief account of how GOA worked to help generate those calls which were "so vocal and so strong." This account will focus on four of the key legislators which GOA targeted, and will show how people's phone calls and letters DO make a difference. This account will also detail the lying and deception which phone callers received from congressional offices; and will show how when armed with the truth, callers could "smoke out" the untruths being spoken at the other end of the phone.

[.....]

GOA helps drop Republican contributions by 80%

GOA learned this summer that House Minority Whip Newt Gingrich (R-GA) was working actively to forge a compromise on the crime bill. None of the compromise talks even considered dropping the gun ban from the bill.

So GOA acted quickly and issued an alert asking people to call Gingrich, as well as Haley Barbour, the head of the Republican National Committee. GOA provided the phone and fax numbers to these offices, urging callers to deliver a simple message: "We don't need this crime bill -- especially not one with a gun ban in it. Moreover, we will not contribute to the Republican Party as long as they continue to support Republicans who vote for gun control."

[....]

It goes on and on....

http://www.gunowners.org/news/nws9410.htm
 
Last edited:
and here's how he thanked us AFTER we gave him control of the house:

http://www.gunowners.org/aw9503.htm

www.gunowners.org
Jan. 1995

Your Phone Calls are Desperately Needed!
-- Republican leadership still giving us the shaft

by Gun Owners of America

(January 27, 1995) -- We know it must have been hard to believe. Some of you called and asked if we were really serious. "Is the Republican leadership so dumb as to ignore the ones who helped give them control of the Congress?"

Well, Wednesday's alert gave you the scoop two days early. Listen to what the Associated Press is now reporting: "The [Republican] leaders' negotiators spent much of Wednesday in strategy sessions trying to figure out how to block attempts to use a new crime bill as a vehicle to repeal the gun ban. . . . [They] discussed breaking the crime package into seven or eight separate bills so as to throw a procedural roadblock in the way of any [gun ban repeal] amendments."

They're now talking about putting off any action on the gun ban repeal until May! Can you believe this? We took them to the dance and now they're telling us to stand in the corner. Folks, this is outrageous! "

etc.
 
I'll be darned. After a couple hours of research, it appears that although Mr. Gingrich voted for the crime bill originally, which sent it to the Senate for the first time, he voted *against* its final passage, in the form of of "Conference report agreed to in House: On agreeing to the conference report - Agreed to by recorded vote."

http://clerk.house.gov/evs/1994/roll416.xml

AND, it was 235-195, NOT 216-214. :scratches head: It was HR 3355, 2nd session of 103rd Congress.

Well, good for him. I was misinformed. Maybe Gingrich isn't so bad after all. See also

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d103:HR03355:@@@X

it passed the Senate 61-38.
 
Does that mean he voted for it before he voted against it? :rolleyes:

Your postings seem to me to be defeatist because they deal in large part with global domination scenarios that are already a done deal and leave America/Americans under the thumb of some uber collection of financial barons...and there's nothing we can do about it.

No, what we have to do is educate ourselves and others as to what's going on and who pulls the strings overwise they're gonna bury us. There's alot we can do about it. One thing that doesn't help though is denying the problem even exists. That's why the neo-cons exist. To confuse the liberty minded folks. If people weren't speaking out the government would already be launching more attacks on us.

And by the government I don't mean your district representative. I'm talking about the corrupt elite near the top of the pyramid. People like Gingrish, Schumer, The Clintons, The Bushes, Rumsfield, Wolfowitz, Cheney, John Forbes Kerry, Arnold, Henry Kissinger...

And these people are all controlled themselves.
 
Back
Top