NEW TSA Travel Restrictions

Fremmer, get real. You know what happened to that Reid idiot. If not, here's a recap: he acted up, and got his arse handed to him by the passengers. NOT by any TSA goon or Marshal, just a bunch of regular people who'd had enough.

If TSA were disbanded tomorrow (hey, I can dream, right), planes wouldn't start dropping out of the sky. They didn't before TSA existed, although terrorism has been around for millennia. Put it this way: if YOU had a chance to prevent some lunatic from killing you, wouldn't you take that chance? Or would you quietly sit and accept your fate?
 
Actually, I think that adopting a policy of not hiring out straight out of affirmative action / Welfare-to-Work programs would improve things greatly, along with eliminating the TSA as a federal agency and putting it under the authority of each airport.

Having the top person in charge be available in that physical area instead of in Washington would go a long way towards cleaning things up. I also wish for a policy where any Federal employee who steals or commits a crime (however small) is forever barred from benefits, pension, re-hiring, etc, along with any Federal monetary assistance programs and state welfare. Think how much money we'd save. By the time most of these people make it to the time they'd be retiring, most of them would have been busted for stealing someones watch or jewelry to sell on eBay, let alone the people who take the women aside into 'molestation rooms' for a 'physical search' while hiding their nametags. (Now those types should be taken out into the street and shot.)

Then they could just live out their days in their natural habitat after being fired.
 
Rid the planet of TSA and you have 55,000 unemployed people. Go to their web page - their moto is (sit down before reading)

"TSA ... VIGILANT, EFFECTIVE, EFFICIENT."

In their defense, there hasn't been a terrorist attack carried out using a commercial plane since they came into being.
 
- Start focusing on the damned AIRPORT WORKERS. Don't tell me that I need to leave my jewelry at home because the government doesn't trust the people (in and out of TSA) that have access to our baggage, food, ramps and planes.

Which means if I was a terrorist I would get the stuff on the plane via a corruptable airline worker. Or get some of my guys hired as airline workers.
 
Question:

These terrorists were going to take explosives disquised as common products onto airliners and blow them up in flight. These explosives were not detectible by sight, x-ray or bomb detectors due to their packaging. As a result, they come up with "NO LIQUIDS OR GELS OF ANY KIND WILL BE PERMITTED IN CARRY-ON BAGGAGE. SUCH ITEMS MUST BE IN CHECKED BAGGAGE."

Would not the same bomb work just as well packed into checked luggage?

BTW, anyone remember an old way of smuggling drugs? Put them in balloons, swallow them and squirt them out the other end when you arrive in the US. Maybe they need to ban exlax on flights, just in case the BG cannot get his bomb to pop out.
 
Rick, the proportion of attacks to flights before 9/11 was vanishingly small. I give TSA no credit for stopping anything.
 
Would not the same bomb work just as well packed into checked luggage?

My understanding is the components (which are supposed to be everyday items available everywhere) could be smuggled onto aircraft by multiple persons, then the cocktail mixed and detonated.
 
Well gang - I fly out of Houston to Atlanta on Monday. I'm pessimistic, but will be sure to report on my memorable experience. I'm sure TSA is going to do everything they can to ensure I make my flight in time and remain comfortable while waiting.
 
Liquids are being dumped into one big tub at the end of the line in many airports now.

That's gonna go real well when some smartass brings in a gallon each of bleach and ammonia.
 
I rather run from the terminal than run from a plane at 35,000 feet.
And, of course, those are the only two choices available to the most powerful nation on earth.

Exactly why most "reasoned" people say:
"I'd rather run from a criminal, than run from a criminal with a gun. Please, Senators, we need more Gun Control."

:rolleyes:
Rich
 
I rather run from the terminal than run from a plane at 35,000 feet.

How about profiling and agressive border/imigration control, then you wouldn't need to do either.

But it's much more politically correct to take hair spray from a 60 year old grandmother than it is to tell Osama bin Rehman that you've selected him and his wife for addidtional screening because they have muslim names, have traveled to Afghanistan and have alot of suspicious deposits in their bank account. :rolleyes:
 
Good thread! I've been at the hospital all day. :(

What, pray tell, would you have the government do in response to the specific threat of terrorists mixing explosive liquids on airplanes? And I mean specifically in response to the threat. Several alleged terrorists have been arrested, although some remain at-large. The government must respond by implementing security measures to respond to the threat. Would you have the government do nothing? I understand that security, immigration, and several other areas need work, but to argue that liquids should not be banned from carry-on luggage would be tantamount to hiding your head under the sand and ignoring a specific terrorist plan to blow up airplanes.

The security measures are certainly irritating. But they are not illegal. You don't have a Constitutional Right to fly with liquids and/or carry-on luggage.
 
Good thread! I've been at the hospital all day.

Hope it was nothing serious.

What, pray tell, would you have the government do in response to the specific threat of terrorists mixing explosive liquids on airplanes? And I mean specifically in response to the threat. Several alleged terrorists have been arrested, although some remain at-large. The government must respond by implementing security measures to respond to the threat. Would you have the government do nothing? I understand that security, immigration, and several other areas need work, but to argue that liquids should not be banned from carry-on luggage would be tantamount to hiding your head under the sand and ignoring a specific terrorist plan to blow up airplanes.

Not sure if this was directed at my post of not but here goes.
The initial response all around was prudent IMO. It's not a matter of simply banning liquids from carry ons. Liquids can still get on board unless they are going to do a strip search also. Metal detector and x ray machines for carry ons can't find plastic bottles taped under clothing. The current practices are better than doing nothing at all. I support using the full body xray machines, but there aren't enough in use.
Electronics, xray them, swipe them for explosives, check for function, then convert the overhead bins with locks that are locked before pushing back from the gate and leave them locked until safely at the destination gate.

The security measures are certainly irritating. But they are not illegal. You don't have a Constitutional Right to fly with liquids and/or carry-on luggage.

I would certainly rather fly without a carry on, however I'm required to travel with a laptop and choose to fly with a few other nice to have items like a flashlight, an ipod and a gps. I very seldom use any of them in flight, I carry them because of theft. If the airlines would reimburse more than $650 for items they break/lose(steal) I would gladly put all of the above in a suitcase and hope it gets there. But under their current policy of "Yes we know we're incompetant boobs here's your $650 for your $4000 dollars worth of stuff we lost (Our employees stole)." So far this year I've flown 85,000 miles and "lost" 1 cameras, 1 pair of boots and a cheap mp3 player out of my checked luggage on international flights. If airline employees are willing to steal from customers I'm sure they are not above being paid to put "stuff" on an airplane for Osama. By the way one of the arrested in the U.K. was part of airline security at Heathrow.
Before I hear "You would rather trade safety for $4000 in property", No I would rather have both, I see no reason I should have to give up any property other than the price of a ticket to travel. When I buy my ticket if they would just say "We're going to steal whatever we want from your checked luggage." I would change my travel plans.
 
It seems that they are allowing laptops and the like . Anyone remember what took down the plane over Lockerbee Scotland ?


Yep, it was a Toshiba radio/cassette player in a brown samsonite suitcase it was routed to the flight via the interline baggage system at the Luqa Airport on Air Malta flight KM180 to Frankfurt and then to PA103 to Heathrow. It was an unaccompanied bag in the cargo hold of the aircraft.


edit: The model of the cassette player was the bombeat and it was loaded with semtex and a timer.
 
All I've gotta say is "Wonderful, just Wonderful." :rolleyes: SWMBO and I have gotta fly to Phoenix just after Labor Day. I have about zero hope that this will have cooled down by then. There ain't no way I'm checking my laptop, and everything else goes in my checked baggage anyway. But I figure I'm gonna be tied up at Hartsfield forever trying to get outta here.
 
All I've gotta say is "Wonderful, just Wonderful." SWMBO and I have gotta fly to Phoenix just after Labor Day. I have about zero hope that this will have cooled down by then. There ain't no way I'm checking my laptop, and everything else goes in my checked baggage anyway. But I figure I'm gonna be tied up at Hartsfield forever trying to get outta here.

I'll trade with you........I'm coming from Islamabad via the U.K. back to the states.:(
 
Back
Top