As Americans, we should all heed this warning and be prepared - the Islamofascists who would kill every Jew make no distinction between Americans and Jews, as America is the declared ally of Jerusalem.
So in what way are the people of Islam fascists? Are they comprised of a system of government marked by centralization of authority under a dictator, stringent socioeconomic controls, suppression of the opposition through terror and censorship, and typically a policy of belligerent nationalism and racism?
Fascism doesn't fit in with the current goings-on as the term is being applied to militants who are not in a government with centralized authority or promoting dictatorship.
As for Americans being an ally of Jerusalem, what do you mean? Americans are not allied with a city in Israel, but the government and country of Israel.
It is rather interesting that militants would make no distinction between Americans and Jews as the American government supports. Said militants did make a distinction between Saudi Arabia and the infadel American forces even though Saudis supported the infadel Americans in attacking other Muslims.
It is a naive and hugely over simplified consideration to suggest that militant Muslims would be as quick to harm Americans as Jews because America has supported Israel. The conflict goes way beyond aupport of the Jews and dislike for Americans being established long before modern Israel was established.
As much as Hitler and the Nazis hated us, the radical Muslims hate us even more. To Hitler, we were a problem. To the radical Muslims we have become deadly enemies.
This is something of a nonsense statement and geared to insight conflict. The role of Hitler against the Jews wasn't simply because he considered them a problem. I don't see how Hitler's attempt at exterminating Jews could be viewed to reflect him thinking Jews were a problem. The only reason I can see to down play the Holocaust in this manner is so that the conflict with Muslims be played up as being so deadly that nothing else has been such a threat to Jews. Of course, Hitler's problems with the Jews are being downplayed as that is simply resolved history. Hitler is dead.
Muslim terrorists have made no secret of their plans for Jews. They have made it very clear that not a Jew should be left alive in the Middle East.
Just how does this supercede Hitler's wishes and attempted execution to see that no Jews are left alive anywhere in the Third Reich?
If militant Muslims are a greater threat to Jews than Hitler was, then why are militant Muslims so slow and poorly organized in their endeavor against Jews? Keep in mind that Hilter killed around 6 million Jews in a few years. Militant Muslims haven't accomplished this level of killing in all the years since the end of WWII.
So militand Muslims want to kill the Jews. Why is this so surprising. Non-acceptance of other faiths isn't uncommon. Strangely while Christians are supposed to be so forgiving, The Bible calls for killing those who worship other gods (Deuteronomy, Chapter 17:2-3,5). Of course, Deuteronomy is the fifth book of the Hebrew Bible as well. Exodus 35:2 has it that anyone working on the Sabbath should be killed. Given that Sundays are not of religious significance to Muslims, they would be inclined to work Sundays and therefore should be killed.
Leviticus 24:16 states that he who blasphemes the name of the Lord should be stoned to death. Obviously non-Christians would be common targets as they are not believers.
So we villify Muslims for the words in the Quran, but think nothing of the fact that our religous texts call for similar killings. So Christian and Jewish teachings are as much of a threat to Muslims as vice versa. If our texts call for the killing of Muslims or other non-believers of Christianity, then why is it a shock that the reverse is true?
I have to laugh whenever I hear the battle cry of "Never Again!" "Never Again!" issues seem to be issues that do come back again and again. This battle cry, as it turns out, doesn't seem to reflect more about preparations and fighting back as much as a plea for divine help to act on behalf of those who really aren't doing all that much to make certain events don't happen again. "Never Again!" seems to have a very short duration of time giving that 'never' is supposed to be just that, never. Instead, "Never Again!" cries are until events do happen again.
The first terrorist attack on the World Trade Center produced the battle cry. How much good did it do? None. An attack did happen again and was worse than the earlier attack.
We do like our broad brush in the country.