tahunua001
New member
it's a guy on a bicycle being chased by a bear...
what hard data is this?
where is the 308/30-06 which failed to save this guy's life?
where is the 8mm which did save his life?
this is just getting obsurd.
I'm going to go full troll here and quote your second post on this forum just under 2 weeks ago.
obviously, judging from this thread you have no interest in learning anything. your only interest appears to be what you intend to contribute to anyone planning on trips up to Alaska regardless of how flawed your information is and how many people are telling you that it is flawed. here over the last couple days you have had so many people telling you the same thing, you can't keep them straight and appear to think they are all the same member.
every piece of data that you have posted,
1. bear information with little or no animal weight and method of harvest info given-to strengthen your claims of 650LB black bears, the 3rd largest taken was 375LBs.
2. field and stream magazine opinion piece-to scientifically prove that 323s are more lethal than 30 calibers.
3. unarmed guy running from bear that was scared off by pistol fire- to prove that he would not have been saved by a 30 caliber rifle
not one thing you've posted as proof is irrefutable, and most is almost completely irrelevant or entirely unusable as a credible data source.
EDIT: perhaps you are unsure of what credible sources are. here is something that took me about 2.5 minutes to find from a credible source.
this study conducted in hospitals over a 5 year period with human victims seems to indicate that there was no correlation between the increase in caliber used and the increase in mortality and everything to do with placement of the shots, although advances in medical treatments may have scewed results.
what hard data is this?
where is the 308/30-06 which failed to save this guy's life?
where is the 8mm which did save his life?
this is just getting obsurd.
I'm going to go full troll here and quote your second post on this forum just under 2 weeks ago.
obviously, judging from this thread you have no interest in learning anything. your only interest appears to be what you intend to contribute to anyone planning on trips up to Alaska regardless of how flawed your information is and how many people are telling you that it is flawed. here over the last couple days you have had so many people telling you the same thing, you can't keep them straight and appear to think they are all the same member.
every piece of data that you have posted,
1. bear information with little or no animal weight and method of harvest info given-to strengthen your claims of 650LB black bears, the 3rd largest taken was 375LBs.
2. field and stream magazine opinion piece-to scientifically prove that 323s are more lethal than 30 calibers.
3. unarmed guy running from bear that was scared off by pistol fire- to prove that he would not have been saved by a 30 caliber rifle
not one thing you've posted as proof is irrefutable, and most is almost completely irrelevant or entirely unusable as a credible data source.
EDIT: perhaps you are unsure of what credible sources are. here is something that took me about 2.5 minutes to find from a credible source.
this study conducted in hospitals over a 5 year period with human victims seems to indicate that there was no correlation between the increase in caliber used and the increase in mortality and everything to do with placement of the shots, although advances in medical treatments may have scewed results.
Last edited:
