More Powerful, 9mm or 40 caliber?

I get so tired of this.

I can put the same amount of rounds down range out of my P2000 SK (subcompact) .40 S&W as I can with my P30 9x19mm (full size) in the same amount of time. The accuracy differences at 0-15 feet are nonexistent.

Yes, I carry 9x19mm at times, and I carry .40 S&W at times; I don't prefer one over the other.

CZ SP01 Phantom holds 18+1. Honestly, I'm not sure if there are any factory .40's that have that capacity. Not that I'm of the "Spray-n-Pray" mindset though.
 
Energy transfer definitely matters.

We had a guy brought in to our ER who had been struck with a golf ball to the head.There was zero penetration, no temporary wound cavity, and no permanent wound cavity, but it killed the guy.

All energy represents is the potential to do work. It is the type of work done with the energy that matters. The person in your ER wasn't killed because of mystical waves of energy radiating off the golf ball. He was killed because the impact damaged his brain physically in some fashion. There may not have been a cavity in the sense of a bullet cavity; but there was definitely physical damage.

Same thing with bullets. A bullet with 600 ft/lbs of energy that delivers all of its energy but doesn't hit anything vital will be less effective than a bullet with 300 ft/lbs of energy that penetrates the heart. The energy itself is only a rough measure of the work potential of the bullet.
 
Energy transfer definitely matters.

We had a guy brought in to our ER who had been struck with a golf ball to the head.There was zero penetration, no temporary wound cavity, and no permanent wound cavity, but it killed the guy.

when it comes to 9/40/45, energy delivered makes no difference. none of these will "knock a man down".


the energy these calibers delivers simply equates to a small temporary wound cavity that reforms around the permanent one.

penetration and expansion are what counts (along with shot placement, of course).
 
Old topic, new point "More Powerful, 9mm or 40 caliber?"

I made a comment of 9mm VS 40cal.

This is what I wrote.

I was told by a LEO, the 9mm has more potential for over penetration. Not sure were he got his information in San Diego.
 
About the same really. The 9 will shoot lighter bullets better and the 40 will handle heaver bullets. The muzzle energy can be about the same, depending on the bullet weight. For a woods gun I will take the 40, for any thing else either is fine.
 
Generally speaking, the major factors involved with overpenetration are:
- bullet diameter
- bullet weight
- bullet velocity

As bullet diameter increases, penetration decreases.
As bullet weight increases, penetration increases.
As bullet velocity increases, penetration increases.

Very easy to find a heavy bullet weight 9mm + P that would penetrate more than a light weight, low energy .40.

Conversely, also easy to find a light weight bullet 9mm round that would penetrate much less than a heavy, high energy .40 bullet.

Generally, .40 bullets are heavier, therefore the recommendation regarding use of such caliber in woods or brush.
 
Last edited:
Sectional Density

Read the first couple links, and that should give you a good idea.

I used to be very confused back in the day as to why lighter, faster bullets with more momentum and more energy always penetrated less than their heavier counterparts. Then I heard about sectional density.

Check it out! :cool:
 
The numbers are definitely in the 40's favor.

I doubt that it's enough to be of any real concern, though. ;)
 
9mm or .40?

I just skip the .40 and use either the 9mm or .45acp. To me, that certainly differentiates the two from each other as compared to 9mm vs. .40 S&W.
Actually I really like both of these calibers and believe it or not, the .45acp seems to have a little less recoil than some .40's I have shot....
 
metweezer

More Powerful, 9mm or 40 caliber?
Which has a stronger recoil or more stopping power a 9mm or a 40 caliber handgun?
More powerful? If you look at kinetic energy or look at momentum, generally the .40 S&W is marginally more powerful.

Recoil: if the mass of the weapon firing the two cartridges are the same, the more powerful round will impart more energy to the firing platform which will be felt as more recoil by the shooter. (For example, if you could convert a handgun from 9mm to .40 S&W)

What does that mean in terms of incapacitating a human threat? Very little, if anything; compared to the skill of the shooter and his/her ability to place accurate shots to center of mass quickly in a life threatening situation.
 
8shot357

Old topic, new point "More Powerful, 9mm or 40 caliber?"
I made a comment of 9mm VS 40cal.

This is what I wrote.
I was told by a LEO, the 9mm has more potential for over penetration. Not sure were he got his information in San Diego.
I am not familiar with any evidence to support your LEO friend's assertion. It would be helpful to know what is meant by over penetration. Is it a bullet that has passed through over 12" of the torso of a human threat or merely 4 inches of a limb without hitting a bone? Is it a bullet that has passed through two interior walls without hitting wood? I have read the first 5 years of published FBI ammunition tests and have perused the Box of Truth website . . .

As to over penetration:
Since 4 times as many bullets miss the intended target in a defensive shooting situation as those which hit; the consideration given to "over penetration" seems wasted. If it is determined that of those bullets that actually hit the intended target, say 10% actually fully penetrate the target that makes the missed an even greater ration of all bullets fired. Instead of 4 to 1 it would be 40 to 1.

Aren't you afraid of over-penetration?
• The fear of over-penetration is a misconception, which was created back
when law enforcement was trying to overcome misinformed public
resistance to the use of hollow point ammunition. In the process, we
began to believe it ourselves. First, our lawyers are unaware of any
successful legal action resulting from the injury of a bystander due to a
round over-penetrating the subject. We are aware of numerous
instances of Agents/officers being killed because their round did not
penetrate enough (Grogan and Dove, for example). Further, if you
examine shooting statistics you will see that officers hit the subject
somewhere around 20-30% of the time. Thus 70-80% of the shots fired
never hit their intended target, and nobody ever worries about them -
only the ones that might "over penetrate" the bad guy. Third, as our
testing shows, even the most frangible bullets designed specifically for
shallow penetration will plug up when striking wood or wallboard and
then penetrate like full metal jacketed ammunition. We are aware of
successful legal actions where an innocent party has been struck by a
shot passing through a wall, but as we have proven, ALL of them will
do that.
FBI 10mm Notes
SSA Urey W. Patrick, Firearms Training Unit
FBI Academy, Quantico, VA


Focus on the much more important goal of quickly and accurately hitting the threat.
 
The .40 has more potential, if the shooter can shoot it as accurately and quickly as he can the 9mm.

The additional question is, can the shooter do that shooting not only from Weaver, Chapman, or Isosceles, but also one-handed and weak-handed?

If the answer is no, the 9mm might be the better option.

Oh, yeah, practice counts, too... if the shooter can't afford to feed his .40 (or .45, etc) at the range, he might also be better off with the 9mm. Muscle memory counts, especially under high levels of stress.
 
one of the reasons i'd prefer a 40/45 over 9mm is that the 9mm is more apt to yaw through a car windshield. i'd feel confident with any though, :)

(not likely i'll need to shoot through a car windshield anyway lol)
 
The .40 IS more powerful....will that mean anything in a SD moment? Who knows...but the key is just have one of them and know how to use it.
 
If you follow the energy charts the .40 has more foot pounds
but, does it really matter? I think shot placement is probably
more important.
 
Back
Top