Mobs are unpredictable things, and they're fueled by anger. One person getting shot won't defuse that. There have been plenty of instances in which use of force has only escalated things.It only takes a few times of someone (The beaters) getting shot or getting hurt to most times stop this.
That's exactly the sort of public statement that can come back to bite one in a court proceeding.Empty a mag and not bat an eye. Thats a self ddefense situation and what a CHL is for.
Seriously?We're so fixated on guns... what about driving a truck into the crowd? (and not at a crawl, either) I bet that would disperse them.
See my first statement. More likely, the driver would become the enemy, and they would swarm the truck. Who would the courts see as the antagonist? The driver.
In situations from Watts to Aurora to Ferguson, people have entertained the fantasy that they would be a one-man riot dispersal tool by presenting a firearm. That is emphatically not the case. Situations like this are no-win scenarios, and the gun could quickly become a much greater liability than an asset.