Minnesota: Man Charged in Deaths of Intruders

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'll be honest. This sounds way more like two burglars that accidentally stumbled on a serial killer, then legal self defense.

It's a little of both; that's what makes it an interesting case.
 
Not seeing any legal self defense about it. Its not a difficult argument to make that both were premeditated murder.

*shooting persons who did not pose a threat after the initial shoot each time.
*where'd that handy tarp come from?
*removing the bodies.
*murdering a potential witness.
*going to dinner before calling police.
*not calling 911 at any time.
*no affirming via 911 that you are in danger, or making similar warnings to others.

Yea this has serial killer/really dumb mob guy wannabe all over it.
 
A man's home is his castle.

No argument there, but just being in his "castle" does not confer upon a homeowner the absolute authority of a medieval warlord. Self defense is a right. Killing the wounded is just despicable, and I predict will not be looked upon very well in the courts ......
 
As commented I haven't heard or know just what took place concerning those two kids and Mr. Smith. And again I'm not fully privy to all the police reports and court testimony. Only what information our local news media releases. (But it is what it is gents.) A persons Right of Self Defense to a (point?) in their own home. So from now on "I'm going to hide my guns and get myself a Stick!! Otherwise I might find myself in court facing my peers too."

I am surprised some are trying to defend him. If he put a gun to her head and shot her when she was no longer a threat then that's murder. And he deserves to go to jail.

So from now on "I'm going to hide my guns and get myself a Stick!! Otherwise I might find myself in court facing my peers too."
No need to hide your guns just doint execute someone when they are no longer a threat. Do you not see the difference in self defence and murder.
 
Last edited:
So from now on "I'm going to hide my guns and get myself a Stick!! Otherwise I might find myself in court facing my peers too."

If the man had just gutshot them both and held them at gunpoint where they fell at the bottom of the stairs while he called the police, he'd have nothing to fear from facing his peers.

He'd likely be lauded as a hero, succesfully defending his home.

Instead, he crossed the line, executing the wounded.

I find it disturbing that someone could defend that behavior.
 
green_MTman said:
i would like to suspend this idiots FID card or pistol permits and LTC for a couple years.and make him take a gun safety coarse to get his guns back.
Seriously?!? Suspend his FID and make him take a gun safety course?!? :eek:

green_MTman said:
but i dont think he should face criminal charges.if someone unarmed breaks into your house,you dont know there unarmed how is one to know they dont have a gun or knife in a pocket or under a shirt or pant leg.

the unarmed part is irelivent,its the victims perception of whether the assailent are armed or not that matters.

but he seems cavalier and arrogant and should loose his guns for a period of time
No, it's not just "the victim's perception of whether the assailant is armed" that is relevant. The "victim's" perception must also be reasonable, as a general rule. He shot one intruder, dragged his body over to a "handy tarp" (premeditate much?), shot the second one and executed her.

I'd say that a little more than FID suspension and mandatory gun safety training will be the likely result, and rightfully so.
 
Glenn E. Meyer said:
Premeditation can take only seconds according to some trials I've read. This guy is a disgrace to humanity if the story is true. Stress is NO excuse.
I have also seen claims (by prosecutors) that premeditation can be formed in an instant. I didn't accept the notion then, and I don't accept the notion now. Words have meaning, and the prefix "pre" to me clearly means "Before, in advance of," not "during, in the heat of the moment."

That said, the more I read about this case the more I think it was a premeditated execution. An article I saw on-line today indicated that, in addition to sitting in ambush, the guy had a tape recorder running through the entire incident. I didn't get a sense that he volunteered this to the police; it appears that a detective happened to notice it on a shelf.

While I was initially on the fence, I am now leaning very heavily in the direction of believing that the guy laid a deliberate trap for the burglars, and that he had every intention of killing them if they returned. I don't think he was in the least bit in fear for his life.
 
That said, the more I read about this case the more I think it was a premeditated execution. An article I saw on-line today indicated that, in addition to sitting in ambush, the guy had a tape recorder running through the entire incident. I didn't get a sense that he volunteered this to the police; it appears that a detective happened to notice it on a shelf.

While I was initially on the fence, I am now leaning very heavily in the direction of believing that the guy laid a deliberate trap for the burglars, and that he had every intention of killing them if they returned. I don't think he was in the least bit in fear for his life.

IMHO, setting up an ambush at a choke point (stairs) was a tactically sound thing to do- If someone broke into my house, I'd have done the same.

Recording the event would be a good idea, too, I think.

Where the guy erred was "shooting the wounded".

If he had shot them and held them at gunpoint while he called the police, and before the police (and EMS) got there, one or both of them bled out and died ..... I could not condemn him for that either- it would not be safe for him to approach an assailant that might not be hurt as bad as he looked- but shooting them when they posed no threat is, for me, beyond the pale. I think a jury will find him guilty of murder.... and rightly so.
 
These two were certainly not very bright and in the end it cost them there lives. The homeowner because of his actions looks like some kind of a nut for finishing this pair off, both showed poor judgment but had they not broke into his home in the first place perhaps they would still be alive.
 
The homeowner because of his actions looks like some kind of a nut for finishing this pair off, both showed poor judgment but had they not broke into his home in the first place perhaps they would still be alive.
I would describe executing someone as more than a bit of poor judgment. Breaking the speed limit is poor judgment.
 
Can't kill a vampire with a headshot.

Only a zombie.

Reading some of these comments really makes me wonder at times if we truly are not in the end times of the Republic.

Obviously our educational system has completely failed...
 
Can't kill a vampire with a headshot.

Only a zombie.

Reading some of these comments really makes me wonder at times if we truly are not in the end times of the Republic.

Obviously our educational system has completely failed...

Obviously we need Monster Hunter International to develop a "Combating the Undead" curriculum for the Public School System to address this deficiency ......:D
 
This sounds way more like two burglars that accidentally stumbled on a serial killer, then legal self defense.
Smith doesn't appear to meet the MO for a serial killer. Let's not go there.

Let's also drop the zombie/vampire silliness. This is a grave situation. Let's also remember that people who would use this against us read this forum as well. Snide comments about Smith's actions could be construed as support.
 
Wow, what a screwy situation and it leaves itself to a lot of speculations. Who knows what really happened?

Sure he says what went down but had they put him on a lie detector?

I can't blame the guy because of the past burglaries but why the hell don't he put up a security surveillance system? Or get a dog?

I think he went too far but I think he snapped as well when he finally came face to face with the burglars. Did he think it's the same burglars that hit him before? And they have his guns?

The girl laughed when she got gut shot? And she came down after all that ruckus? C'mon, give me a break, there's more to this. For all we know, he told her to come down or he'll finish off this guy.

That old man's missing his straw to his chocolate shake. :rolleyes:
 
"Who knows what really happened?"

Smith does.

And he gave a pretty vivid account of what he did, an account that is supported by forensics, and which paints a very damning picture of him and his actions.

And, given just how damning an account it is, one really can only take it at face value.




Oh...

VAMPIRES!

:p
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top