Cliff notes summary: A 30 lb package of marijuana is intercepted by drug agents in Arizona; addressed to the wife of a small-town mayor in Maryland. Police posing as deliverymen drop the package off on the mayor's doorstep, then execute a swat raid as soon as the package is brought in the house. The mayor's two labrador retrievers are killed by police during the raid. Now, police theorize that the package was part of a scheme involving parcel delivery personnel, and the addressee had no knowledge of the illegal contents. At this point, the victims of the raid appear squeaky clean, and are both "civil servants". They're calling for federal civil rights investigations into several aspects of the raid.
Here's the latest article: http://wjz.com/local/police.raid.mayor.2.790454.html
Worth clicking on the short news video in the right hand column...shows the victims holding a press conference.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Potential discussion points (legal/political):
* Another "no knock" warrant, reserved for dangerous known criminals and rarely granted (we're assured ), here misused on prominent citizens with no criminal background?
* Raid carried out by county officials without any consultation with police from local jurisdiction?
* Killing of household pets, always a hot issue...coupled with the other data above, perhaps indicative of "over exuberant" swat/drug warrior mentality?
* Possible double standard applied to the raid victims because they are public officials, post-raid? (Like stacking charges as often done to defame the suspects). Now, all of a sudden, this is NOT an isolated screw-up?
Police are still defending the raid; it could make for a very interesting case.
Here's the latest article: http://wjz.com/local/police.raid.mayor.2.790454.html
Worth clicking on the short news video in the right hand column...shows the victims holding a press conference.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Potential discussion points (legal/political):
* Another "no knock" warrant, reserved for dangerous known criminals and rarely granted (we're assured ), here misused on prominent citizens with no criminal background?
* Raid carried out by county officials without any consultation with police from local jurisdiction?
* Killing of household pets, always a hot issue...coupled with the other data above, perhaps indicative of "over exuberant" swat/drug warrior mentality?
* Possible double standard applied to the raid victims because they are public officials, post-raid? (Like stacking charges as often done to defame the suspects). Now, all of a sudden, this is NOT an isolated screw-up?
Police are still defending the raid; it could make for a very interesting case.