Liberal Media & Entertainment

Worm
can you quantify how much attention was given to each of those issues?
This is typical of the left wing... They make only the challenges that they already know connot be accepted and ask only questions that cannot be answered without a multi-million dollar, two year environmental study!
has anyone ever considered the possibility that there's a liberal media bais because that's what the majority of the nation wants? perhaps right wing ideas are not as wonderful as y'all think they are
This is typical of the left wing method of transferring the responsibility off of themselves It is propaganda manifested... Transfer the responsibility either by an impossible challenge or by blaming somebody else.

When these methods are not working for them... they yell, and chant, and spit invective, and do anything they can to distract the observer from the point at hand... They bait and switch and they can do so because they have no honor, and no respect for people other than themselves nor for ideas other than their own...

Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton continue to wear $2000 suits and yet, find a following among a people who have been falsely convinced that the rest of the nation is against them merely because they are a different color. :rolleyes:

The very, very rich and influencial people that claim to be Democrats "for the people" continue in their do-nothing, obscene opulence. Another shell game which bleeds the life-blood from these people as surely as the "Numbers games and the National (legalized) Lottery". :mad:

The ghettos have not changed one damned iota since the Liberal Robin Hoods began "throwing money" at the problems as if that was going to make all the difference... :p
Handy
it is not unfair of ANYONE on this board to ask for backup on such a statement.
Depends on how you ask... :cool:
 
This is typical of the left wing... They make only the challenges that they already know connot be accepted and ask only questions that cannot be answered without a multi-million dollar, two year environmental study!
Uh, no. I'm simply asking for something to back up the claim. Simply saying that there were more articles on one issue than another does not prove the claim. Perhaps you simply observed what you wanted to observe. Perhaps you're right. But either way you can't claim to be stating a fact unless you can back it up with something other than your own beliefs.

The rest of your post has nothing to do with the comment you're replying to. You went off on some tangent about Sharpton and Jackson, neither of which have anything to do with my suggestion that maybe right wing attitudes are not as popular as you guys want them to be.
 
redworm, just look at the contrast of political opinion that dominates the mass media with those compared to the ones expressed on the internet by MILLIONS of us.

Thats proof in it's self. The liberal media hates it.

Those people now have a medium in which to communicate they'er own ideas without us:eek:
 
Don't leave out the Kennedy's.

The only Kennedy that carbiner should be remembering to include in this discussion is the one about which I already asked him to provide a citation or source. Drop the rhetoric and provide some facts for a change.

C'mon man, it's been three days of this crap, you either have it or you don't - it's not like you haven't had ample time, since you've found the time to continue posting other poorly written nonesense. You disrespect everybody but not answering for yourself like a man.
 
Last edited:
If liberal propaganda were so easy to expose, this thead would not exsist, nor would it need to.
Any pro gun human can see it easily just by the way the media reports on guns and anything that surrounds guns. Guns are the best way to see blatant liberal bias.
They also use direct and indirect association to negative circumstances when the report on any issues they don't like
your just rough around the edges because you know liberal bias is alive and well
just look at the contrast of political opinion that dominates the mass media with those compared to the ones expressed on the internet by MILLIONS of us.
Thats proof in it's self. The liberal media hates it.

so....the proof of a biased liberal media is easy to find, but difficult to expose? and everyone should know this, because of evidence no one can be bothered to present because liberals never present evidence of their claims so why should we?

:rolleyes:
 
redworm, just look at the contrast of political opinion that dominates the mass media with those compared to the ones expressed on the internet by MILLIONS of us.

Thats proof in it's self. The liberal media hates it.

Those people now have a medium in which to communicate they'er own ideas without us
dude, you've got to be playing with me. are you suggesting you've read posts by millions of people that go against the liberal media bias???

proof in itself? I think we have different definitions of the word "proof". my background is in science; proof requires something a bit more substantial than mere conjecture
 
Infact, no matter how clearly anyone exposes the poverty of your logic you will simply change the analogy.

And or deni.
 
*were
*deny

But yes, I spent many years learning how to properly research and investigate what others believe are facts. "Proof" of something requires more than you simply claiming it. Where are your millions of internet people that hold conservative views? Two million? Tens of millions? Hundreds of thousands? Where are you getting the data for these claims?
 
Reporters are mostly very liberal bias and anti gun.

Every time there is a story in a newspaper about an arrest and guns were found or used, the reporter always describes 3 handguns and 500 rounds of ammo as an "Arms cache". Any rifle with a scope is a "Sniper rifle". Even if the guns were legally owned, the reporter will question their legal status, whether or not the evil gun owner was properly licensed, but of course doesn't check or include this in the story. The reporter will describe how the Police have to be extra careful with a suspect if they are known to be an evil gun owner or have a CCW license. Any military style rifle is of course a dangerous cop killer assault weapon. Every chance these liberal reporters get, they add these negative, stereotype adjectives to every gun and gun owner description, in an attempt to villify the gun, the gun owner, and all gun organizations. And of course, whenever a gun is used for self defense, the gun owner is portrayed as a vigilante nut gun owner. It is their small liberal contribution in their push for more gun control and socialism, to brainwash even more young uneducated minds, to blame guns for crime, when in fact it is the criminals who do not obey gun control laws. :barf:
 
redworm, When the NYT, or say, Wolf Blitzer-CNN use loose and open ended statements, such as: MANY WOULD DISAGREE.

CRITICS SPECULATE. or MANY BELIEVE.

My personal favorite, EXPERTS SAY.

Do call/write them for a detailed, factual, and proven in the court of statistical physics report.

Or is it ok when the elites in the liberal media do it, and not me or others on this forum.
 
The obvious, and I repeat, obvious, is that the media openly glorifies Fonda and Kerry and Clinton, Ms Clinton, etc etc etc....

And obviously vilifies, Limbaugh, Hannity, OReilly, Bush, Rice, etc etc etc...

That does not need quantifying...

Wormtongue knows damned well what I meant when I mentioned the names of prominent liberal leaders in the previous posts... and he knows damned well that this is an obvious example of Liberal media bias...

We don't hear the good news from Iraq... unless we get it from the internet bloggers.

THE LIBERAL MEDIA IS NOT OBJECTIVE AND IT DOESN'T EVEN MAKE THE ATTEMPT TO BE FAIR!

The Liberal left made a really big deal out of the Broward county people SUPPOSEDLY being cheated out of 600 votes... And they didn't make any kind of a protest in favor of the several thousands of military votes that were DEFINITELY not counted because of a technicality... :rolleyes:

THEIR BALLETS WERE STILL AT SEA on a Naval ship and when they arrived too late to be unloaded from the ship they were dismissed... But the damned chads absolutely had to be counted AGAIN AND AGAIN and when the recount showed a win for Bush, the media reported that the Bush Republicans cheated the Gore Democrats out of the election... :mad:

It doesn't need to be explained any further than that... :p
 
redworm, When the NYT, or say, Wolf Blitzer-CNN use loose and open ended statements, such as: MANY WOULD DISAGREE.

CRITICS SPECULATE. or MANY BELIEVE.

My personal favorite, EXPERTS SAY.

Do call/write them for a detailed, factual, and proven in the court of statistical physics report.

Or is it ok when the elites in the liberal media do it, and not me or others on this forum.
conservative news reports don't use phrases like that?

I do like how you call them elites; it's funny that some folk see liberals as some noble class out to oppress the john waynes of the world.


The obvious, and I repeat, obvious, is that the media openly glorifies Fonda and Kerry and Clinton, Ms Clinton, etc etc etc....

And obviously vilifies, Limbaugh, Hannity, OReilly, Bush, Rice, etc etc etc...

That does not need quantifying...
yes it does, otherwise you're not backing up either statement you just made. provide examples because you can't simply expect everyone to take your word for it. bruden of proof lies with those trying to make a point, those making a claim.
Wormtongue knows damned well what I meant when I mentioned the names of prominent liberal leaders in the previous posts... and he knows damned well that this is an obvious example of Liberal media bias...
lol namecalling, is that part of thsoe "traditional american values" that conservatives hold so dear? :p
We don't hear the good news from Iraq... unless we get it from the internet bloggers.
yeah, let's pay more attention to people who can say whatever they want without having to actually research their information. free media is a good thing but blogging is not journalism.
THE LIBERAL MEDIA IS NOT OBJECTIVE AND IT DOESN'T EVEN MAKE THE ATTEMPT TO BE FAIR!
no more or less than conservative media :)
The Liberal left made a really big deal out of the Broward county people SUPPOSEDLY being cheated out of 600 votes... And they didn't make any kind of a protest in favor of the several thousands of military votes that were DEFINITELY not counted because of a technicality...
you sure? because I was living in Florida at that time, I was seeing it in the news every day and the military votes were brought up just as often.
THEIR BALLETS WERE STILL AT SEA on a Naval ship and when they arrived too late to be unloaded from the ship they were dismissed... But the damned chads absolutely had to be counted AGAIN AND AGAIN and when the recount showed a win for Bush, the media reported that the Bush Republicans cheated the Gore Democrats out of the election...

It doesn't need to be explained any further than that...
well gore was certainly a crybaby about all that but all the ballots should have been counted, including the military ones. certainly not fair that people were excluded from voting but that doesn't change the fact that I saw both issues getting equal coverage. unless you can prove your claim that one got more than the other I still don't see why anyone would take your word for it

Quantification. It's a wonderful concept.
 
I see most firearms enthusiasts here realize the elite liberal slant againts guns.

Like I said before, you'll never hear an elitist liberal admit to it, simply, because they agree with these elite veiws in the media.

Ten years ago the elite libs had a solid control over the "Psychological Climate" the media portrayed.

Man must be penetrated in order to shape such tendencies. He must be made to live in a csrtain Psychological climate.
Jacques Ellul, Propaganda: The formation of mens attitudes.

So, how well has the liberal media done?
Good. They have worked hard to shape our attitudes about guns, weather we like or not.
 
In what sense are you using the word "elite" because I'm not sure I follow. :confused:

edit: nevermind, I misread

I understand what you're saying. When it comes to guns and drugs most news outlets tend to villify the objects and lump the responsible users in with the few bad eggs. It's the same reason many right wingers are so anti-drug; they've bought into the same brand of propoganda that left wingers have over guns. But that still doesn't change the fact that there ought to be some kind of hard evidence to support a claim that there's a vast left wing conspiracy to only show the good side of Democrats and the bad side of Republicans.
 
And the Liberal media knew that, from the beginning, all the way through their persecution of Limbaugh...giving that subject FAR more "air/print time" than was ever given to the various Kennedy's for their real or alleged offenses...

Unlike the loudmouth, the Kennedy's haven't spent years ridiculing those who have had problems with drugs.

http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=1159

I heard very little from the media at all on Limbaugh, considering the sheer level of hypocricy demonstrated by this right wing spin master. For years, Limbaugh has called for harsh treatment of drug offenders.
Now that he is one, and one who managed to weasel out of any serious charges, you would expect a media so heavily biased towards the left to not let this one rest.

I believe media is biased, either towards the conservative or towards the liberal.
True objective reporting is a myth.
 
The Kennedy family owes financial reparation to America.

They have behaved like ditzy teenagers since day one. JFK was a big time dope head when he was is office, he was on psychotropic drugs for liberalism, just like Pat.

The whole family has a history of liberalism, and just look at what it did them, the same thing is happening to America.

Conservative Media is the immune system which is in a fight for Americas health.
 
The Kennedy family owes financial reparation to America.

They have behaved like ditzy teenagers since day one. JFK was a big time dope head when he was is office, he was on psychotropic drugs for liberalism, just like Pat.

The whole family has a history of liberalism, and just look at what it did them, the same thing is happening to America.

Was he really taking drugs while in office?
What did liberalism do to the Kennedy family? What do you believe it's doing to America?


Conservative Media is the immune system which is in a fight for Americas health.
lol
 
Oh, it's just not worth it anymore. :rolleyes:

I feel sorry for and apologize to anybody reading this trainwreck of a thread, to which in no small part I contributed, but then, I guess it's just too much to ask for any sort of proof when a claim is made.
 
Back
Top