'Initially' if the simple, reasonable, option of simply alternating their training times is rejected; then yes, I would feel it necessary to point out the violations of county regulations.
And I completely agree that having them pay for use is just shuffling county funds from one dept. to another, but if parks and rec. Employees are cleaning up the mess and maintaining the facility after the SO uses it, I don't see why that money should not go from the SO to parks and rec.
Also, the range was not built for the LEO's, it's part of a county recreational complex that has space and allows things banned in other public parks (including a dirt bike/ATV track, a RC model plane flying area, and the shooting range. All things that have some inherent liability issues, that's why the county built them outside of town near each other, SPECIFICALLY SO THE PUBLIC HAS A SAFE AREA TO ENJOY THESE ACTIVITIES.
And, unfortunate as it would be, if as some have suggested, the SO wants to close the range to the public, then I would actually have no complaints because then County Parks and Rec. would not be responsible for its upkeep, as it would no longer be a public park facility.
Thankfully, it's not up to the SO, hence the reason I will be speaking with the county commissioners (elected officials, in a very pro-gun community).
And I completely agree that having them pay for use is just shuffling county funds from one dept. to another, but if parks and rec. Employees are cleaning up the mess and maintaining the facility after the SO uses it, I don't see why that money should not go from the SO to parks and rec.
Also, the range was not built for the LEO's, it's part of a county recreational complex that has space and allows things banned in other public parks (including a dirt bike/ATV track, a RC model plane flying area, and the shooting range. All things that have some inherent liability issues, that's why the county built them outside of town near each other, SPECIFICALLY SO THE PUBLIC HAS A SAFE AREA TO ENJOY THESE ACTIVITIES.
And, unfortunate as it would be, if as some have suggested, the SO wants to close the range to the public, then I would actually have no complaints because then County Parks and Rec. would not be responsible for its upkeep, as it would no longer be a public park facility.
Thankfully, it's not up to the SO, hence the reason I will be speaking with the county commissioners (elected officials, in a very pro-gun community).