Dust Monkey
New member
Quote:
Until then, this is an easy enough ruling to work around.
If you understand the ruling state that if consent is necessary it should be genuine, why would you want to work around it?
For the same reason cops over use the term "Person of Interest".
If they are a labeled a suspect, they have protections, rights that the cops must adhere to. If your a "person of interest", your NOT a suspect. So it's easier without that messy constitution in the way. Just google "person of interest". It will make you see red.
So a work around is our cops finding a loophole around what the constitution and the courts say. Is that simple. The cops know what they legally need/have to do, but want something easier so there are no hurdles, what we call protections, in their way.