SerenityNetworks
New member
Whoa! Where did you see that price?Taurus 24/7 g2 compact 285.00
Whoa! Where did you see that price?Taurus 24/7 g2 compact 285.00
Whoa! Where did you see that price?
Not to give you a hard time, but why didn't you just send him a PM?OK I'M GOING TO BE NICE THIS ONE TIME
Don't be greedy guys save me one
http://www.idealsportsman.com/produ...barrel-12-rounds-polymer-grips-blue-finish-77
Yep. Exactly why I want to shoot a model before I buy....none have been able to shoot it as well as their other firearms. It's much easier for me to get good, fast hits with a subcompact Glock than it was with the PT145.
I carry a full size when I hunt, so this isn't an issue. I'm looking for a .45 carry gun now.I could hit ok with it and killed a feral hog with it but it wasn't easy to shoot.
I showed the OAL of the Witness to be 7.3" OAL (4.8 High) and the Thunder 6.8" OAL, so I am still wanting to take a look. But the Thunder does show to be 5.1" High, so like you say it may be too big.If the Witness Compact is too big the Thunder most certainly will be.
I wish the Pavona came in .45 ACP, but even then the OAL is 7.3" so I think it would be too big as well.That only leaves the Pavona in the witness line.
I hear you. Thanks. Of course, it's always a combination of many factors with both the pistol and my body, but for me and the way I dress the width of a double stack is generally not my biggest concern. I'll just have to try it to see for sure.It's not about OAL on the Thunder compared to Witness. It's the width, double stack that has ambi controls. The OAL is one of the shortest in a .45