By all means, feel free to cite where I stated any such thing with regard to being "reasonable" in the above context...
Like when you made this tautology?
But reasonable people do take reasonable measures
Or when you stated that anyone who wasn't doing it your way was doing it wrong or was paranoid?
At no point did I say a word or even imply anything about controlling someone else's behavior to such a point
Let alone state/imply something such as "no chance"
You responded to a comment by a person who said that "...I cannot control the actions of others." by saying: "Then you're doing it wrong"
When you were called on making such an obviously ridiculous statement, you tried to make it seem like it should have been clear that you weren't saying what you clearly said but rather that people should take those 5 words and automatically form them into a fully fleshed out philosophy of home security.
Well, it makes perfect sense that you would do your best to try to walk back such a ridiculous statement, but unfortunately what you followed with didn't make much more sense.
I clearly stated... "if I believed there was a need"
Note the >I< in there?...
You clearly stated:
The subject is about carrying inside your home
You are responsible for the safety and security of your own home
If one cannot maintain a level of such so that they believe they have to carry a firearm on their person while inside it...
Then YES that person is doing something very wrong
Or simply paranoid
I don't for a moment believe that you are incapable of keeping track of what you said, even when I quote you exactly. What do you think it is called when someone quotes a person EXACTLY, and then responds to the EXACT quote and then the person being quoted EXACTLY tries to pretend that the quote was not correct?
And clearly you missed the part where I stated...
Everyone is free to do as they like
My opinion is just that, an opinion
Agree or disagree
I missed nothing. And this is a ridiculous statement in the context of your repeated accusations that anyone who doesn't share your opinion is paranoid or "doing it wrong".
In fact, it would be comedic if you weren't dead serious.
Cite where I asserted any such modifications that would "complicate rapid exit significantly"
"... physical barriers and obstacles, properly secured windows..." Virtually anything that makes it harder to get in, makes it harder to get out. Not a difficult concept.
The above is nothing but more non sequitur and projection
Again please cite where I stated ANY of the above things...
--"I would either move or seek some therapy"
--"Then you're doing it wrong"
--"If one cannot maintain a level of such so that they believe they have to carry a firearm on their person while inside it...
Then YES that person is doing something very wrong
Or simply paranoid"
---"I would either move or seek some therapy"
You seem to be taking this VERY personally
But I will say that your .... projections ...
You can even call me a Bozo to your hearts content if you please...
Ah. Right on cue--I figured we were getting close to this phase.
The "Someone disagrees with me, therefore it must be personal." philosophy is completely consistent with your position so far that "reasonable people" do as you do and those who don't...well...
In case it's not obvious, you're certainly entitled to your opinion. And to state it. Where things start to get sticky is when you can't leave it there and you have to take the next step of saying that you believe that those who don't share your opinion aren't reasonable, are paranoid, need therapy, are incompetent, etc.
If you feel that your opinion needs more than just reasoning/logic/facts to support it, and you must resort to insulting those who disagree, what does that say about your opinion? What does it say about you?