Theres an example of why he is totally unqualifed to be president. letters of marque indeed
apr1775 said:Right. We can't have a president who upholds his oath of office by only exercising powers granted by the Constitution. We need a president that acts without that darn Constitution in his way.
i think its pretty well established that mr alaska holds little regard for the constitution.
He wants to talk to our enemies? I don’t think that’s a good idea! That's what got us to where we are today... impotent giant and soon to be former world power. "Talk to our enemies"? No... don’t say a word; just bomb the crap out of them!
Vote for Paul??? … I don’t think so!
Impotent Giant... I guess when you spend all your military force pursuing a dead on delivery democracy in the middle of a civil war you can gain that title.
…bombing the snot out of the Mid East… guess we will also bomb Indonesia, since they have a larger Muslim population than the Mid East… need to get nearby Malaysia…
Right, I guess we should not have talked to the Soviet Union for all those years during the Cold War.
I get the distinct feeling this guy would probably make a case for letting Osama himself onto a plane without a pat-down.
A strong case can be made that the Government regulations, along with a lack of private property responsibility, contributed to this tragedy, but what is proposed? More regulations and even a takeover of all airport security by the Government.
We are not even considering restoring the rights of pilots to carry weapons for self-defense as one of the solutions. Even though pilots once carried guns to protect the mail and armored truck drivers can still carry guns to protect money, protecting passengers with guns is prohibited on commercial flights.
(quoted just in case the muddy waters here are blinding readers...)Would you support Ron Paul if the Republican Party nominates him for the office of president?
Besides, both Hillary and Barack are waay smarter than the good doc
Would you support Ron Paul if the Republican Party nominates him for the office of president?
the O'Reilly factor.
In 1998 Osama declared war on the US. He finally got some people's attention in 2001. RP still thinks jihad is some kind of yoga. Instead of boasting about reading the 911 report, maybe he should take a look at a few more sources, e.g.:
Future Jihad, Walid Phares
Hatred's Kingdom, Dore Gold
Fighting Terrorism, Benjamin Netanyahu
Unveiling Islam, Ergun Caner
The Sword of the Prophet, Serge Trifkovich
Epicenter, Joel Rosenberg
Koran
We're still getting a bunch of "no way I would vote for Ron Paul, he's nuts (or stupid)."
The best that I can tell, many people are hung up on his foreign policy.
Please share some reasons why. Also I ask anyone still uncertain about Dr Pual to go to ronpaul2008.com and read his positions or go look up his voting record in congress.