Gary Conner
New member
Speaking of looking into candidates:
The Obama message said he generally supported the rights of:
That says it all.
He thinks you should be a "legitimate" hunter. Problem is, does he mean non-poacher, or does he mean "legitimate" in the eyes of members of commitees in the Senate who try to get things passed on voice votes?.
Say for instance, our "representatives" pass a bill on a voice vote while we are at work, that there is no "legitimate" reason to hunt rabbits, deer, quail, dove, squirrel, elk, moose, bear, turkey, or hogs? Does he believe at that point, all firearms which can be used to kill some or all the aforementioned animals can be banned?
What does that leave? Hmmmm. Trap and Skeet? Okay, so you can keep a shotgun but no rifles.
Then in an effort to protect the children from harm, a month later while we are all at work, the Senate and House pass a bill on a voice vote saying that you are not a "legitimate sportsman" if you want to shoot skeet or trap, and that it simply isn't a necessarily "legitimate" sport.
So does Obama feel that all firearms which can be used to shoot trap and skeet can be outlawed? Is it legitimate to want to plink with a .22?
Well, I guess that is up to Congress?
Obama feels the 2nd Amendment doesn't come into play, where it says "the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed" and that only an arbitrary definition of "legitimate sportsman or hunter" determines if the 2nd Amendment counts?
We are in deep, deep fecal matter today boys and girls.
Obama has won every primary by at least TWICE the amount of votes that John McCain and Mike Huckabee recieved combined.
John McCain will be defeated by a landslide margin. Conservative Republicans are staying away from voting for McCain in DROVES.
He is as cooked as a goat on payday weekend in South Texas. Done. Finito. It is over.
We are in bad, bad shape. Obama is anti 2nd Amendment. McCain likes to reach across the aisle, (do what the other side says) to be "bipartisan".
The Obama message said he generally supported the rights of:
legitimate hunters and sportsmen
That says it all.
He thinks you should be a "legitimate" hunter. Problem is, does he mean non-poacher, or does he mean "legitimate" in the eyes of members of commitees in the Senate who try to get things passed on voice votes?.
Say for instance, our "representatives" pass a bill on a voice vote while we are at work, that there is no "legitimate" reason to hunt rabbits, deer, quail, dove, squirrel, elk, moose, bear, turkey, or hogs? Does he believe at that point, all firearms which can be used to kill some or all the aforementioned animals can be banned?
What does that leave? Hmmmm. Trap and Skeet? Okay, so you can keep a shotgun but no rifles.
Then in an effort to protect the children from harm, a month later while we are all at work, the Senate and House pass a bill on a voice vote saying that you are not a "legitimate sportsman" if you want to shoot skeet or trap, and that it simply isn't a necessarily "legitimate" sport.
So does Obama feel that all firearms which can be used to shoot trap and skeet can be outlawed? Is it legitimate to want to plink with a .22?
Well, I guess that is up to Congress?
Obama feels the 2nd Amendment doesn't come into play, where it says "the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed" and that only an arbitrary definition of "legitimate sportsman or hunter" determines if the 2nd Amendment counts?
We are in deep, deep fecal matter today boys and girls.
Obama has won every primary by at least TWICE the amount of votes that John McCain and Mike Huckabee recieved combined.
John McCain will be defeated by a landslide margin. Conservative Republicans are staying away from voting for McCain in DROVES.
He is as cooked as a goat on payday weekend in South Texas. Done. Finito. It is over.
We are in bad, bad shape. Obama is anti 2nd Amendment. McCain likes to reach across the aisle, (do what the other side says) to be "bipartisan".