You may well be correct Mr. Keenan, and I figured you were yanking my chain a little No problem.
On 1903's...I had a low-numbered sporterized Springfield back when I was 16, and dinosaurs roamed the earth. I was long on P&V and short on caution in those days, and utterly ignorant of the problems inherent in that batch. A buddy had a loader and we ran quite a number of stout reloads through that old gun. Mine must have been made on a day when the light was just right, because it stood the strain of a couple of teenagers with a loading press.
I also agree regarding the improved safety margins built into modern arms. Out of the three blown rifles I mentioned, no one was significantly injured. That alone says a lot.
I remain interested in hearing further expert diagnosis of the problem with the subject gun.
On 1903's...I had a low-numbered sporterized Springfield back when I was 16, and dinosaurs roamed the earth. I was long on P&V and short on caution in those days, and utterly ignorant of the problems inherent in that batch. A buddy had a loader and we ran quite a number of stout reloads through that old gun. Mine must have been made on a day when the light was just right, because it stood the strain of a couple of teenagers with a loading press.
I also agree regarding the improved safety margins built into modern arms. Out of the three blown rifles I mentioned, no one was significantly injured. That alone says a lot.
I remain interested in hearing further expert diagnosis of the problem with the subject gun.