+1 to Wayne for post #44!
Gun controle
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For full autos I feel that the law on the books is good as it stands. If you cant afford the tax stamp and cant pass the background check you dont need one. Crinimals cant afford the price of admitance to the auto world unless there stolen.
You're okay with "the [full auto] law on the books ... as it stands"?!
Are you aware that the laws regarding full autos provide that you can't own one manufactured after 1986 -- so there is a VERY FINITE supply of them. Even if it were easy to get the approvals necessary before you can purchase one (and I'm sure it can be very difficult to pursuade an anti-gun judge or sheriff in some jurisdictions), there are now only so many full-auto guns to go around. Period.
So unless it became legal to trade in newly-manufactured full-auto guns, the general public is screwed by these laws. Should it cost upwards of $8000-10,000 for an M-16??! WHY? The price is that ridiculously high only because of the laws that you say should stay the way they are. Were you simply unaware of the state of the laws, and what they do, before you said that?
Oh, and it's not as simple as just "qualifying" to purchase these guns -- it's not about just paying for the tax stamp and getting a background check. As I understand it, you have to get a judge or sheriff to sign you off for the purchase. As I said, in some localities, that may be next to impossible to get them to agree to do. Try doing it in Massachusetts, Maryland, California, Illinois... ad nauseum. :barf:
Hell, it'd probably be hard enough in a relatively pro-gun state like Florida, if you lived in Miami or somewhere like that.
-blackmind