Little Wolf
New member
None!!
how much gun control do you want?
When citizens have to acquire a certificate to allow them to exercise their rights they are not rights but privilages and they are no longer citizens but subjects.My latest idea is to have prospective gun owners aquire a certification which allows their background (criminal record and mental health) to be verified. This could be updated at intervals. Then they owner should be able to buy the weapons they want (with no records). If the owner is "safe" then the number or type of weapons is irrelevant.
Why?We can debate what a "right" is all day, but felons and those deemed a danger to themselves or others by a qualified doctor should not own guns, and every effort should be made to ensure this is the case.
I disagree. They pay their debt they get a do over. If they can't be trusted to act responsibly in polite society they should not be allowed back into it.As far as felons, I'm talking about a lifetime ban.
So which one do you want, a background check, or no background check? These two conflict.
I'm an advocate for mandatory marksmanship classes and firearms handling classes in public schools. But that's not what you mean is it? A lot of folks say that and they really mean something like the hunter safety courses which seem to be taught every third full moon when it falls on the second Sunday of the month, between the hours of 3 and 5 AM. Great in theory but unaccessible to the masses.Mandatory safety training, that's it.
I was trying to be pragmatic. There will always be some form of gun control. Having a certificate would help to silence those against guns
and at least be an attempt at keeping guns in safe hands, while reducing the hoops you have to jump through to get weapons.