Deuce, you are welcome here and I have some questions
Let me preface this by saying that we can all learn from all of our own differences with one another. When I read about someone who has a differing opinion, I don't always automatically laugh at it or disregard it, I instead try to consider where they're coming from and why they do what they do.
When I decide to carry a 4th firearm, which isn't often I will take along my Ruger 454 Casull Super Alaskan Redhawk loaded with 5rnds of the 454 Casull and 1 rnd of 45LC.. don't ask WHY.. haha I just do it that way...
I read this and was suprised and confused
. So here are my questions:
1) Would this gun (if you carried it as a 4th gun) be your initial choice for SD or a last resort? The recoil and capacity to me would deem it to be unrealistic for such a purpose.
2) Is the 45 colt round your first round? So this way the first shot (which is almost always the most crucial) has less recoil?
3) How exactly would you carry the 454? You stated that the para 45 is a shoulder holster, so do you have 2 shoulder holsters? Are you right handed? If so, I would think a 45 acp be on your left (for a right hand reach) which then makes the 454 a right side shoulder holster for a left hand reach? Or do you have it on your hip but you said already had a 9mm on your hip which brings me back to the same question.
The next question is more of a general question:
If for instance you were in a SD situation, you would reach for your para 45 (correct me if I'm wrong) and lets say it was against 3 guys (which I think is a
worst case scenario) is it rational to say that if you shot one, and incapacitated him, that the other guys would try to fight you knowing that you may have just shot and killed one of their buddies? Would they really risk their skin to get your wallet or something else? Wouldn't they run? Or maybe try to save their friend from death? What are the odds that ALL of them would have guns and ALL of them were also willing to shoot you? I mean I know its possible but how often does a scenario like that take place? And if it did, wouldnt your instinct of survival cause you to run away rather than take them all on?
My point is, if you JUST had the 45 and a reload or maybe the 45 without the reload, what kind of a situation would you have to be in for that to be not enough firepower?
I live in Pittsburgh and like other cities, there are bad areas. In a SD situation, I would like to have my glock 19 (1 or 2 mags of hydrashocks) or my S&W 686-3, loaded with 125 gr HPs, with a speedloader. If I had EITHER one, I would feel completely safe, or at least confident (in the gun + myself) if something happened. With either one I trust my shooting ability and I trust the lethality of the bullet, in both type and caliber. And if I was somehow in a situation were I needed more than 15 shots with my glock, or even more than 6 with my 357, I would probably be trying to run instead because something historic must be going on at that point. Thats just my opinion of it. I'm not sure that I would ever carry 3 guns for the above reasons and I would much rather reload one really good gun than pull out another which has its own possible failure frequency and its own idiosyncrasies.
If anyone else has any questions or comments on this post, go right ahead.