No, you are incorrect again. It's an extraordinarily good analogy, but you're just not making the connection.
Minority group: law-abiding gun owners
Minority group: law-abiding Jews
Both oppressed because the powers that be just don't like them (albeit for different reasons), and the general public is not sympathetic to their plights. Successive, incremental, oppressive laws restricting their rights and freedoms. At some point, it's "too late" to do anything through the legal channels, because the entire government and media propoganda machine has generated too much inertia to turn the propoganda tide back to the way the framers of the Constitution intended. There's no way the political process can work as intended to undo the damage done, if you go to far and cross the point of no return.
We're not there YET, as the Jews were in 1939, but we're ON OUR WAY there, slowly but surely. That's one difference, granted. But it doesn't make the analogy absurd - we're just at a differenc point in time along the chronology of events. This is but one incremental step in the process, getting the geneal public, including almost 1 out of 5 conscientious gun owners, to convict their fellow man for
CLEARLY
Unconstitutional laws.
What part of the "the right to keep AND bear arms shall NOT be infringed" don't you and others get?
So if we don't jury nullify on this one, there's the next step and the next step and the next, and one day all of a sudden ALL guns are banned, and then rellascout and WA say, you know, we tried working through the political process and that didn't work, and so NOW it's time to jury nullify before actually taking up arms to resist violently, right? Guess what - at THAT point in time, it will be too late to jury nullify. NOW is the time to take back our rights.
So the analogy is ANYTHING but absurd or extreme. It's about violations of our basic fundamental human rights like speech, press, religion, association, RKBA, etc., just EXACTLY as happened with the Jews in Nazi Germany, and incrementally chipping away at those, while propogandizing the general public against us until it's too late to do anything about it through the political process OR through jury nullification. Which leaves the *highly* undesirable two last remaining choices of violent revolt or just Bohica and become a fascist state. And over 83% of folks on this board seem to think there's a reason jury nullification is in order here - I submit most likely because they understand my analogy is perfectly analogous, in all relevant respects.