mtlucas0311
New member
I think people my want to look at the issue from a diferent perspective, there are at least two weapons bans still in place. the first is the 1934 business that doesn't nec. make anything illegal (3 classes I believe?), just a pain to get or keep. The second is the 1989 (?) ban on imports, wouldn't it be nice to buy an HK 91 for the same price as an AR? We've all just kind of gotten used to the stupidity. The 1994 "ban" was an ambitious attempt to get em' in one swoop. Luckily the manufacturers were able to sidestep via the difficulty in defining exactly what they wanted to ban (or could get away with banning). My point is, just like taxes, once the foot is in the door they will just keep wiggling in a little at a time and wait for you to "get over it" until they push a little farther. I don't think you'll see a "major" sweeping ban, even with the Dems controlling all of congress and the head executive job; it's just to volitile a subject. But watch for import ammo bans, AMMO TAXES, victim reparations, and who knows what else. They'll nip away slowly at the segments that all the hunters and especially sympathetic non-gun owners don't care about. Think about that guy/girl you know that doesn't really care about guns but supports your rights as a whole; alot of times they say "you don't really need that anyway".