How does the Glock 19 and the Sig P320 Compact stack up against each other?

^ That's a good point too. I often watch YouTube reviews of firearms and I notice that when they take pull measurements on camera they often only do one pull (they don't take an average) and they don't pay much attention to where on the trigger they're pulling, which as you pointed out can have a big impact. Even the speed at which you pull can affect the measurement as if you pull past the break it will sometimes count part of the wall at the end of travel, at least on my Lyman digital gauge.

As I said it's a really nice trigger to begin with. Doing failure/Mozambique drills at the range and I honestly don't notice the difference between it and my APEX M&Ps. It's really only if I want to get fancy and put clays out on the berms that I notice it a bit. Even then the shortness of the trigger travel makes it pretty easy.
 
I own both the 19 and the 320 compact,Both are good .
The 320 is a bit bulkier with a higher bore axis but it does not seem a flippy as some of the other sigs.I give the edge to (my)particular 19 for the trigger.But
My 19 gen 3 EXO model is not stock,has thousands of rounds through it with an over travel stop ect.I have owned 4 G19,s and several other Glocks and none has matched this one,That said My 320 has a better stock trigger than any stock glock trigger I've felt.But striker fired triggers very a lot gun to gun in the same offering,When I bought mine I tried the full size first and its trigger
was not nearly as nice as the compact I bought it was close to 2lbs heavier and had more overall travel.Accuracy was at least as good if not better and ergos
are very nice.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top