Never mind that the laws all put together en masse, equal dictatorship AKA: conspiracy.
And we have a winner folks.
Never mind that the laws all put together en masse, equal dictatorship AKA: conspiracy.
Hey, I fully support law that protects and upholds rights.
I don't support the littany of laws that are existing on the books today, that don't, and actually allow all flavors of government and law enforcement to disregard rights of the people they are employed to protect.
Translated: I pick and choose which laws I want to follow.
You are deliberately misrepresenting. "Support" has nothing to do with "follow."
I would never support a person in any uniform who upholds prohibition laws that don't deal with UPHOLDING rights.
On view arrests (seizure of a person) are allowed so long as there is probable cause, and the defendant is brought to a magistrate as soon as is reasonably possible.The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
It was not reported and there was no investigation...how can it be deemed acceptable
My problem with the whole thing...once I looked into it and got passed the propaganda...was that they shot someone before they had any proof he was an illegal or a criminal
That's why it was tried in a Court of Law, not on the internet.That what this whole case is about.
I know of nobody on this site that has access to all the facts. But I can point to 12 who did, complete with counterbalancing attorneys' ability to challenge procedure, facts and stories.
After all, if they were a couple of Ranchers, we'd be pumpin' sunshine into 'em (in General Population) and there isn't anyone on this site who would raise a finger in protest.
You're not outraged because COPS were prosecuted for shooting someone. You're outraged that ANYONE could possibly be prosecuted for shooting someone who LATER turned out to be an [accused] drug dealer. I'm glad that's out in the open.
Not really, since we now know that several of the agents lied in their testimony
Persactly the point, Stage. The Founders knew this well. But their greatest fear was that YOU would have to live under MY Gray Rules. Thus they made Black and Rhite rules and damned few of them; simple Rules that were intended to err on the side of the guilty, that the innocent not be tomorrow's victims of MY Gray World. It's YOU who are arguing for shades of gray here.Things aren't as gray as some would like us to believe.
The Law either applies to all of us or none of us
This is silly.
Who is the law NOT getting applied to?
There was no case against the "smuggler". The Agents actions destroyed any possibility of a conviction there.