Hand over scope to steady shot

S

stagpanther

New member
There was a thread recently in which the topic of using a hand over the scope came up and I (stupidly) suggested that I thought the practice would likely hurt the consistency of the rifle by putting asymmetric pressure on the scope.

Today while shooting a 280AI rifle I was getting a unusually wide groupings (3" at 153 yds). The front rest point was pretty near the center of balance point of the rifle--I tried the hand over the scope to help counteract any possible pitching movement and the groupings immediately shrank dramatically. I'm now wondering how many tens of thousands of shots I've wasted before trying this.:o
 
It's a pretty controversial topic, and you'll get a lot of opinions on it. I know Mark Bansner recommends this technique while shooting light rifles for groups. I posted a link to his video in the other topic. I think Mr Bansner knows a thing or two about building and shooting light rifles, and I wouldn't discount his knowledge on the subject.
 
Is 280 AI a stout round? Depending on the rifle setup, the recoil force can rotate the muzzle up before the bullet exits the bore. If that happens, it is generally not good for business. Looks like you might have that going on.

Putting hand on the scope adds downward torque on the rifle, so it helps. You just need to keep the rifle's forearm in contact with the front rest till the bullet exits the muzzle. There are few other methods doing the similar. Preloading bipod, adding lead weight to the forearm, installing softer recoil pad etc.

I occasionally put hands on the scope to help ridding canting with heavy and tall scope.

-TL

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
 
I would think if your support arm is nice and steady you would have much more leverage than holding the forearm.
Question, why hold either when shooting from a bench? Unless you are shooting a cannon.
 
Pumpkin said:
I would think if your support arm is nice and steady you would have much more leverage than holding the forearm.

Question, why hold either when shooting from a bench? Unless you are shooting a cannon.
Click to expand...
To pull the forearm down on the rest perhaps. It works the same as pushing it down from the top. Indeed it has more leverage (torque) than pressing on the scope.

-TL

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
 
If you shoot rifles where the front rest is near the fulcrum point--for example an MDT chassis up against the barrier stop--then the hand over the scope definitely helps IMO. Think about leverage angles--if your forend hold is way out there--which do you think is going to make it easier to balance when the front contact rest is close to the fulcrum point?
 
Good point. Pressures on the rest contact point doesn't change the setup's balance.

-TL

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
 
I assume this is all predicated on the rifle resting on a bag or bar somewhere ahead of the action.

- Opt-1: Freehand on the scope
- Opt-2: Freehand holding the forearm in contact w/ the rest.

This should be a simple experiment.

I'll try it tomorrow w/ a Marlin 45-70.
Film at Eleven.
 
Here's the group I shot after a 3" group at 153 yards--only difference hand on the scope.
attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • 280 AI.jpg
    280 AI.jpg
    229.6 KB · Views: 231
Good shooting, Panther.

I was doing barrel tuning (a poor man's version by monkeying with flash hider) on my AR in 6mm ARC, also at 150yd. After 20 rounds, I settled down with one setting and got 0.9moa 6-shot. Not as good but close.

75gr going around 2900fps. Not much of recoil. I will try putting my support in the rifle, scope or not, anyway to see whether it makes any difference.

-TL



Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:
Good shooting, Panther.

I was doing barrel tuning (a poor man's version by monkeying with flash hider) on my AR in 6mm ARC, also at 150yd. After 20 rounds, I settle down with one setting and got 0.9moa 6-shot. Not as good but close.

75gr going around 2900fps. Not much of recoil. I will try putting my support in the rifle, scope or not, anyway to see whether it makes any difference.
Click to expand...
Thanks--But not much of a comparison--I have a custom-made 26" hand-lapped SS match-chambered fast-twist barrel, so I expect to get tight groups with it (assuming I do my part and feed it good ammo). I built a 6mm ARC AR myself and those teency weensie little groups everyone else seems to be getting with the ARC have so far eluded me. You've done better than I have with the ARC.
 
Last edited:
I think maybe there's a little fog about what I said about the scope over hand thing. I'm talking mostly about long barrel rifle set up principally for precision shooting. Balance and weight distribution are very important and have a big effect on consistency. I have quite a few rifles that sit on short gen 1 MDT LSS chassis; no matter what you rest the forend on you're going to have that point close to the fulcrum point for the whole rifle.
 
I am quite happy with consistent sub-moa, 150yd with some varying cross wind. By far this is the most successful part of my AR experiment. Will bring it out to 300yd in the valley of crazy winds next.

-TL

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
 
Hornady published 2 load tables; gas gun and non gas gun. I use gas gun table for AR, which has lower pressure. It maxes out at 2950 fps. My load is a few percent below max for better group. I think it is not too much out of whack.

-TL

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top