Gun terms that just don't go together

S

spacecoast

New member
Without bashing any particular manufacturer or shooting discipline, I thought it might be fun (and maybe educational) to put together a list of some incompatible-sounding firearm-related terms... I'll start...

".44 magnum airweight"

"Zamak revolver" - although I believe these do indeed exist

".50 caliber pocket pistol"


What others can you think of?
 
Glock Perfection.

Sorry. You knew it was coming.

Just to be clear, I don't hate glocks. I just think that, as slogans go, it is extremely arrogant. More of a hit at the ad agency and company than the product itself.
 
"S&W" and "Quality"

If I can't put two boxes of the type of ammunition prescribed on the barrel through it, without sending it back to be repaired and re-timed, it ain't a "quality" revolver.

Not bashing, but stating my opinion on the dichotomy.
 
"S&W" and "Quality"

If I can't put two boxes of the type of ammunition prescribed on the barrel through it, without sending it back to be repaired and re-timed, it ain't a "quality" revolver.
Click to expand...

must have been one a the half plastic ones.
 
overkill0084 said:
Glock Perfection.

Sorry. You knew it was coming.
Click to expand...

Yeah, but did you know it would cause Glock-aid man to show up?



Glock-Aid.jpg

"You have displeased me with your heresy"
 
How about "enough gun"? I know it's used, as in "Bring enough gun" but IMHO it's an incorrect usage. "Adequate gun" maybe. Possibly even "sufficient gun." However, "enough gun"? NEVER!!

I'm with Elmer Keith on this issue. My idea of "enough gun" would fire a cast-iron stove at 2,500 fps.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top