Purdy or Holland & Holland
If I did not know what these were before Googling them, am I safe from being a gun snob (holy heck, some of those guns are worth more than my house, and both our cars combined!!!!!!! $225,000 for a shotgun!?!?)?
Seriously though, you see it all the time (especially in regards to scopes) around here. I saw a thread recently where the expressed budget for a scope to shoot out to 300 yards at medium sized game and informal range work was $400. Inevitably, you had people talking NightForce and other very expensive scopes and explaining why a FPP was better and suggesting he save up a for a few more months to get X. In reality, most "mid-priced" scopes would accomplish what he was looking for.
It seems that the "snobbery" of rifles is calming down in the last couple of years. I attribute it to the success of rifles like the Ruger American, Marlin X7, and Savage Axis. With modern manufacturing techniques, it is not difficult to get a sub-MOA rifle, with glass, for under $400ish. I own a Savage Axis in 223 that shoots under 1/2 MOA (with handloads) and have a 308 on the way. For most rifle shooters, the proof is in the target and snobbery disappears when they see the results. Sure the bolt throw on a custom gun or Sendero may be smoother or the trigger may be crisper, and if those features are important to you and worth the money in your eye to meet your needs, you are not a snob, you are buying what you perceive you need.
For me, it comes down to what product will satisfy the needs and wants of the individual. For me, if product X costs $600 and Product Y costs $900, and both will do what I want them to do, I will buy Product X every time. Some people may differ. To me, that is why there are countless choices for every application, so that everyone can have what they want for an amount they are comfortable spending.