You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Glock 17?
- Thread starter Model12Win
- Start date
Be sure it fits your hand well before you write the check. Some combination of the back strap hump and the spacing of the finger grooves makes the 17 a bit awkward feeling to me. The 19 sits in my hand better, and the 26 best, curled pinky and all.
Nothing wrong with changing the front sight and leaving the rear as is, either, in my opinion. The front sight on my 26 got dinged in short order and was replaced, but the rear sight is still original and doing fine.
Nothing wrong with changing the front sight and leaving the rear as is, either, in my opinion. The front sight on my 26 got dinged in short order and was replaced, but the rear sight is still original and doing fine.
Glenn E. Meyer
New member
There are waves of new Glock variants coming up to confuse and delight you.
Scroll through https://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/
for info and videos. I don't know the guy, just FYI.
Scroll through https://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/
for info and videos. I don't know the guy, just FYI.
There are waves of new Glock variants coming up to confuse and delight you.
I wonder how many shooters are going to end up with the wrong ammo for their Glock 45.
Glenn E. Meyer
New member
I once asked an officer carrying a Glock if it was a 22 as that dept. got new guns. He was incensed and said it was a 40.
Oh, well. Glock is heading for the Golden Days of SW with variants galore.
Oh, well. Glock is heading for the Golden Days of SW with variants galore.
No tritium required, I’ve had my fun with nighters and find them an expensive, fragile, and largely useless gimmick.
A set of OEM Glock night sights runs about $60 - less than non-illuminated sights for many pistols.
I've never had a set break. Even if a tritium vial were to break, you'd still have the functionality of non-illuminated sights.