and three gun, ya still haven't read Kinsman
And you still haven't addressed the lies of 187 either
What happen you, give up
There are none so blind as those who can't see.
Huh/ What exactly have you said to make me see anything
Your pointless points are all over the place and only remotely relevant to the discussion
Like this particular piece of wisdom
I hope that some day you will begin to see that it not someone else's fault when you screw
I hope that some day you will develop the maturity to actually follow and participate in an adult conversation instead of saying nothing loudly
Now go back and actually read my comments and tell me exactly who I blame for this
(here's a hint, my comments have very little to do with the actual accident)
You're missing the point entirely. The 1911 may "by design" not supposed to be carried hammer down on a loaded chamber, but it can be, and there isn't anything stopping people from doing so except for a bunch of lawyer labels in the manual and common sense.
You keep saying that, just before you show that it is you that has missed the point
I never said that the 1911, through extraordinary measures could not be carried hammer down on a live round, I actually said that it could.
I have said many time that it is not designed to be carried that way and you would have to intentionally by pass a design feature to put the gun in that condition
The FA on the other hand forces you to by pass a design feature to put the hammer down on an empty round
There are not a bunch of lawyer labels stopping people from lowering the hammer on a loaded 1911 the design does so by making it harder to do that to use it as it was designed to be carried
Furthermore you assume that the SA was designed to be carried with 6. For all we know it may have been designed to be carried with 5 and only loaded with 6 when needed. Given the vast majority of cowboys who carried in this fashion this may very well have been the case.
Documentation?
For a lawyer you do a whole lot of speculating and ducking and very little proving
Either way, the point is that both firearms have the potential to be equally unsafe when used by idiots or people that don't heed warnings, yet no one would ever call the 1911 a "flawed" design.
Because when carried according to it's design it is a safe carry gun
You have totally missed the point
I gave you a chance to show your stuff
You claim that the defense team was a bunch of idiots to allow this verdict
You have done nothing lawyery in this whole discussion
When asked if there was a specific advantage to the non transfer design you completely ducked the question
You keep trying to compare one dissimilar design to another
If I were on the jury as the average non gun worshiping American I would think that you were deliberately trying to divert the issue and would vote for the award simply because you seem so disingenuous in you argument
All the talk of not wanting to be told what to do via litigation and comparing unwarranted asthectics concerns in dissimilar designs does not nullify the implied warranty of merchantability