GoOfY-FoOt
New member
So, the removal of inadvertent exposure as a criminal offense is a waste of dollars and oxygen?
Show me where a Florida CWP holder was successfully prosecuted for inadvertent exposure (IE) or printing...
The "open carry" bill, as it was titled and written was supposed to be about OC. When the anti's started complaining, that is when the sponsors and the NRA said the bill was about IE or printing. They opened the door for the wording that we have now.
If the bill was truly about OC, they would have stood their ground, therefore the original title and wording was designed to mislead supporters and create the opportunity to "compromise", as stated in my above post.
While the bill does show progress, the tactics used to get it, were iffy, IMO, and doesn't sit well with myself and other supporters of OC. It's the right to carry, as we as see fit for the circumstance, that we support.
It's not about a proverbial urinating contest. Although, the tactics used by our leaders seem to reflect that very thing.