Flattest Shooting?

While I haven't closely examined fired brass from those two extremes I'd be surprised if they were not the same.

I'm definitely not an expert on this, so someone will correct me if I'm wrong (it happens relatively often!)... but the brass I have from my Federal Powershok $18/box looks to be the same as from my $50 box of Federal Premium Barnes TSX and $40 Federal Premium Nosler Partition.
I suspect someone around here would know for sure though.
 
If you enjoy discussing different callibers and th attributes of each that's fine. Lord knows I do.
Your opening thread said yor're getting ready to buy your FIRST hunting rifle. Making LONG range shots with flat shooting calibers might not be the your first consideration...
Not beig smart, just something to think about.
 
@dsnyder
oh no I understand that I won't be making 300+ yard shots for another few years at least on the the range, and probably another 10 years before I can apply long range shots to hunting, it's that I was looking for a rifle that will last me forever, and is capable of doing 300+ yard shots pretty flat. the winchester .270 meets all of my needs, and to top it all off has versatile bullet weights and velocities for various needs I have. sure, it won't shoot as flat as a .257 weatherby, but for 20-25 dollars a box, the ratio of trajectory to value is extremely high for the .270. it's a winner in my book.
 
Back
Top