Don't mess with the Polk cty. FL Sheriff

skeeter1

New member
MIAMI - A fugitive gunman accused of killing a Florida sheriff’s deputy was shot 68 times by SWAT team officers who found him hiding in the woods, according to autopsy results.

Police fired 110 shots at Angilo Freeland, 27, the target of a massive manhunt in central Florida following the shooting death of Polk County Sheriff’s Deputy Matt Williams Thursday.

“That’s all the bullets we had, or we would have shot him more,” Polk County Sheriff Grady Judd told the Orlando Sentinel newspaper.

Judd said Williams was “executed” after Freeland was pulled over in a routine traffic stop on Thursday. Another deputy was wounded and a police dog killed.

Williams, 39, was shot eight times—one bullet fired at close range behind the deputy’s right ear and another in his right temple, according to autopsy results released on Saturday by the sheriff’s office.

Sheriff’s officials said SWAT team members found Freeland on Friday hiding under a fallen oak tree in a wooded area near where the deputies were shot, and began firing when they saw a gun in his hand.

Copyright 2006 Reuters Limited. All rights reserved.
 
That sheriff has the right idea.Im quite sure Hillary Clinton would rather see the sheriff in jail and the perp on the streets.:mad:
 
Personally, I think that the SWAT guys probably decided ahead of time that the perp wasn't going to walk out of those woods. That said, I'd probably send them a "thank you" note if I was a county resident, thanking them for saving taxpayer money. Three boxes of ammo beat twenty years of room and board for the perp.
 
The SWAT officers who shot Freeland have been placed on paid administrative leave, standard procedure in all police shootings.
Payback, time off, AND saved the taxpayers money! :D
 
No matter what kind of scum this perp was the SWAT team is not supposed to be judge, jury and executioner. Their job is to capture a suspect not decide his penalty. Can't imagine that dozens of heavily armed, highly trained LEO's couldn't get this guy without shredding him. What, no infrared, night vision, police dogs, etc.? They just had to hunt him blindly until they faced him from inches away? I can understand him getting shot if he pointed a weapon, refused to surrender, etc. but according to one report on Fox a policeman had this guy by the shirt and he came up with a gun in his hand. How did they shoot this guy 68 times while the officer had him by the shirt?! [EDITED] This is a perfect example of why we don't need paramilitary SWAT teams in this country. Next step death squads a la Iraq, El Salvador, Chile, etc. ?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Followup - long read but interesting

SWAT teams shot suspect with 68 bullets
The Polk County sheriff says they fired 110 times at the man who 'executed' a deputy.
Gary Taylor and Kelly Griffith
Sentinel Staff Writers

October 1, 2006

Face to face with an armed man suspected of killing a Polk County deputy sheriff, SWAT officers riddled his body with 68 bullets.

Altogether, nine officers fired 110 times Friday at Angilo Freeland, who Polk County Sheriff Grady Judd said "executed" one of his deputies.

"That's all the bullets we had, or we would have shot him more," Judd said after autopsy results were released Saturday.

The slain deputy, Matt Williams, 39, was shot eight times Thursday when he encountered the killer who had fled into nearby woods after a routine traffic stop.

One bullet was fired at close range behind the deputy's right ear and another was fired near his right temple, with the muzzle of the gun pressing against his skin, the autopsy showed.

"I am confident that he was ambushed and he was executed," Judd said.

Freeland, 27, was driving a rental car when he was pulled over. Deputy Doug Speirs asked for his drivers license but was handed a fake ID.

Several shots were fired at Speirs as he ran after Freeland, and one bullet struck the deputy's leg, authorities said.

Williams and his German shepherd police dog, Diogi, went into the wooded area looking for the suspect.

After examining the shooting scene, Judd said he thinks Freeland waited behind a large uprooted tree, where it was "virtually impossible to see him."

"I suspect he shot the K-9 first," Judd said. A single bullet killed the dog when it hit him in the chest, a necropsy determined.

Bullets hit Williams in the arms, legs and buttocks, and one lodged in his spine. Though the sequence of the shots has not been determined, it is likely the final two shots were fired into the deputy's head as the gunman stood over him.

Williams was armed with a .45-caliber semiautomatic handgun and had extra magazines of ammunition on his belt, Judd said.

"After he executed the deputy, he [Freeland] took his firearm and the magazines," Judd said.

Two Lakeland police officers exchanged gunfire with Freeland as he apparently tried to reach a nearby house, Judd said.

"I am confident that he was going to that house and that he would have taken them hostage or maybe that he would have killed them," he said.

Judd said the Lakeland officers risked their lives when they "turned him back into the woods."

Taking no chances

With helicopters circling overhead, officers ringed the wooded area and maintained a perimeter throughout the night. They thought he was still in the woods, but Judd admitted Saturday that "we never knew for sure."

The killer was considered so dangerous, Judd wanted only highly trained SWAT officers to enter the woods.

"We were not taking any more chances," he said. SWAT teams totaling 300 officers from across the region answered the call.

A group of 10 -- officers from the Polk, Lake and Marion sheriff's offices, Lakeland Police Department and Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission -- walked shoulder to shoulder, scouring the area.

"The underbrush and woods were thicker than you could ever imagine," Judd said. As one of the officers pulled some brush aside, they spotted Freeland, who was hiding in a hole under a fallen tree perhaps 200 yards from where Williams had been killed.

"They were standing on top of him," Judd said.

Nine of the 10 officers fired when they saw Freeland raise his right hand clutching a gun they would later learn belonged to the slain deputy.

Deputies also found a Taurus 9 mm handgun, which friends told deputies Freeland often carried tucked in his waistband. In one of the pockets of his cargo pants was a magazine of ammunition taken from Williams, Judd said.

Not first brush with law

Although Freeland used many aliases, authorities finally identified him through fingerprints.

Freeland had been arrested by the Florida Highway Patrol in 1999 on charges of not having a valid drivers license, reckless driving, aggravated fleeing to elude, resisting arrest without violence and carrying a concealed weapon.

A trust fund has been set up at Wachovia Bank to assist Williams' widow and three children.

Any Wachovia branch in Polk County will accept donations, or checks may be mailed to the "Matt Williams Family Trust Fund" at Wachovia Bank, c/o Marilyn Watson, 203 Ave. A, Winter Haven, FL 33881.

Gary Taylor can be reached at gtaylor@orlandosentinel.com or 407-324-7293. Kelly Griffith can be reached at kgriffith@orlandosentinel.com or 863-422-5908.


Copyright © 2006, Orlando Sentinel | Get home delivery - up to 50% off
 
68 times is excessive; we were all trained to shoot until the threat is neutralised, not until the threat is a tattered pile of meat. Also, for SWAT, 110/68 is piss-poor accuracy. The whole thing stinks of unprofessionalism.
 
Gentlemen, the next time that you discover a threat, one who has demonstrated the ability to ambush, and kill, another trained officer, nearly at your feet, and with a weapon in his hands, you may report here just how well you handled it. Until then, can we leave the arm-chair commando mode out of the discussion?

Exactly why would the officers have used NVD, or any other sensor, to engage the perp in the dark? Isolating him, and then searching him out in the daylight, gave them the best chance of locating him without additional risk. He'd already killed one dog, and the terrain, as mentioned, wasn't going to be conducive to animal search.

I fail to see any report of the police having physical contact with the murderer prior to the shooting of him. It would appear that the earlier report was, perhaps, just some knee-jerk liberals projection of what he "would bet" happened? After all, it made the story more "PC".

It's a shame that, in all of the responses, so many have to point out that they would have handled it differently. The true reports haven't even been tabulated, and we're condemning officers already. I'm certain that, if any of these posters are actually involved as LEOs, and not civilian employees of a department, they would object in the strongest terms should any issue they were involved in be handled so unprofessionally.

This is a perfect example of why we don't need paramilitary SWAT teams in this country. Next step death squads a la Iraq, El Salvador, Chile, etc. ?

The alternative? Just let the local officers charge en masse into the woods? Now THAT would be effective. Do you really think that the outcome of that would have changed the murderers chances of survival?

The man executed an officer, after killing his dog, and wounded his partner. He then attempted to enter a home, one with unaware people in it. Do you think it was to use the bathroom? He engaged two more officers at that point. He spent the night hiding, then drew a weapon on the officers who found him. Are we more upset because he's dead? Or because they "killed him too much?"

What about the officer's family? What about the officer? Or his partner? And let us not hear any crap about "that's what they get paid to do", either. NOBODY hires themselves out to be killed. It's also not cost effective for the municipality. Here we are, more worried about the death of the murderer, than those he killed by execution. The officers who found this creep weren't going to allow him to shoot them, plain and simple. They weren't supposed to. HE was the one who acted as judge and jury, and empowered them to act as executioners. Ever think of that? :barf: :barf:
 
HE was the one who acted as judge and jury, and empowered them to act as executioners. Ever think of that?

NO one empowers another, or makes another an executioner. That decision is made by each person, on their own. Once they decided to be excutioners, they became just like the criminal they shot, 68 times.
 
Gentlemen, the next time that you discover a threat, one who has demonstrated the ability to ambush, and kill, another trained officer, nearly at your feet, and with a weapon in his hands, you may report here just how well you handled it. Until then, can we leave the arm-chair commando mode out of the discussion?

No. The entire point of SWAT is that they're supposed to be a higher caliber, no pun intended, of professional than you or me or your average beat cop. As soon as they reacted emotionally, choosing to extralegally avenge their buddy's murder, they lost their status as professionals.

Are we more upset because he's dead? Or because they "killed him too much?"

The latter, as you already know. No one here is cheering the perp's actions. We're pissed off because the response was completely disproportionate.

What about the officer's family? What about the officer? Or his partner?

What about them? If you or I hosed down an attacker and continued to shoot long after he ceased to be a threat, we'd be pilloried, and the same people who are applauding the cops' actions in this case would shrug and say we had it coming, and no one would give a rat's about our families.

HE was the one who acted as judge and jury, and empowered them to act as executioners. Ever think of that?

No, because it doesn't apply here. Cops are not executioners. Their job is to apprehend the perp, not pass summary judgment except in the most extreme cases. Were they justified in killing the perp on the spot? Given the available information, I'd say yes. Were they justified in shooting him to pieces? No. Any shots taken after he was no longer a threat were far out of the realm of self-defense or apprehension and into revenge.
 
Give it a break, guys.

Freeland set up the scenario when he executed a fallen deputy in cold blood. He stood over him and shot him twice in the head. Freeland decided his own fate when he came up from that hole with gun in hand. I couldn't care less if he was pointing it at the ground. He was an imminent threat in that moment and, had I been in the group, I'd hardly have called for a "time out" to decide which of us should shoot him and how many times.

He was armed and dangerous and he had nothing to loose. The cops had already lost one of their own and were not about to take any chances. I, for one, don't blame them and I'm offended that anyone here could liken this to murder. If it later comes out that he was unarmed, that's one thing; but based on what we know, he died like the animal he was.

It is not SWAT's job to reason with known cop killers who appear from a few feet away with a firearm in their hand; this is one case where it certainly IS their job to make it home at the end of the shift. I'd pray them no lesser prayer than that.
Rich
 
It seems that the problem some of you have with this isn't that Freeland was shot by SWAT; it's with how many times he was shot.

Anybody stop to consider that maybe the selector switch on SWAT weapons were set to full auto? That would be SOP in that situation, and they aren't going to stand by and argue over which one should take the shot. The instant the threat becomes apparent, they're ALL going to open up.

When you think of multiple automatic weapons going off, 100+ rounds doesn't seem like so much, does it.
 
Wildcard said:
Once they decided to be excutioners, they became just like the criminal they shot, 68 times.
Spare me the histrionics, Wildcard. :mad: :barf:

This man was a murderer. As Rich said, [He] "set up the scenario when he executed a fallen deputy in cold blood." He also decided to hide from the pursuing officers while armed with the deputy's pistol. He had that gun in his hand when they found him. If anything, Freeland made the decision to be executed and chose the method of his own demise.


-Dave
 
+1 to Rich,Capt. Charlie, and Bluesman! Like Capt. said there's quite a difference between shooting the guy that pulled a knife on you at the gas pump, then walking over to him and putting 3 more in him with your revolver to make sure and a SWAT team carrying MP5s and M-16s probably on full-auto and being surprised by the Bob Marley wannabe that shot 2 brother officers and a police dog. Granted plenty of people have no problem killing people, but even most of those people wouldn't hurt an animal(i'm not talking about hunting,but domesticated animals) you're dealing with a very desperate, very sick individual who would do all this. I think the cops should get medals and I think those of you who say the cops fired to many rounds or they played judge,jury,and executioner should really rethink your ideals on this. The one person who made the comparison to death squads needs to get a reality check and you should be ashamed of yourself. Try walking in a cop or soldier's shoes and see how you feel when your buddy is executed. When you tell me you can seperate the emotion from the job I'll paint myself pink and run through Tennessee state singing Yankee Doodle!:mad:
 
Likewise, kudos to Rich, Capt. Charlie, and Bluesman. I did not realize that SWAT would have full auto weapons in that situation, but it certainly makes sense, and yes...that 110 rounds would have taken...what?...5 seconds to shoot off???? With 10 of them firing???

Heck, even if they weren't full auto and just all had XD-40's, that is ONE MAGAZINE PER OFFICER for the ten officers shooting. That doesn't sound too excessive either, does it?????

You guys who think this is murder....gag me. :barf: :barf: :barf:

+1 to the SWAT officers who went home that day. Alive.

Springmom
 
from a practical standpoint....the cost of ammunition used to peforate the killer was much cheaper than the cost of trying him in court...since he is the undisputed killer of the deputy and must have resisted arrest, so what...you expect me to cry over a murderer for having been killed himself?..why should I?..if he wanted a day in court why not turn himself in earlier?...Bonnie & Clyde were riddled by dozens of shots in an ambush and no one is crying foul over their demise long ago...
 
Cop killers are not treated very nicely. I suspect "any" offensive movement would have resulted in the officers opening up. The guy didn't want his day in court, he was trying to escape..... otherwise he would have met them at the highway with his hands up. Sure saved the FL tax payers a few dollars in the long run.
 
Back
Top