Perldog007
New member
Again, a workplace and a home are two different critters even though both may be private property. Union Station in D.C. is public property on a 99 year lease to LaSalle Partners LLC. By virtue of the lease it is private property but open to the public for commerce and transportation. Big ole twisted mess there.
Point being that all private property is not the same. As John pointed out all relationships between various types of property owners and persons on their properties differ.
Again you are providing an imaginary scenario justifying your position. Again I ask if your scenario is so likely how come we can't find an instance of this involving a chl holder when they have been out there on a shall issue basis for twenty years?
So an event that is taking place in your imagination is more compelling than hard data from the real world?
I'll answer that - YES IT IS!! Because we have allowed it to happen.
Employers always start with "safe environment" when they justify victim disarmament. We have to stop letting them get away with this lie. Experience tells us, as well as common sense, that unarmed victims are preferred by violent criminals.
Although it seems like an obvious point,
recent comprehensive research has confirmed that criminals tend
to avoid assaulting, raping or attempting to murder people whom
the criminals think might be armed. See John R. Lott, Jr., "More
Guns, Less Crime: Understanding Crime and Gun Control Laws"
(University of Chicago Press, 1998).
Aaron Zelman Open letter to from JPFO site.
Point being that all private property is not the same. As John pointed out all relationships between various types of property owners and persons on their properties differ.
Again you are providing an imaginary scenario justifying your position. Again I ask if your scenario is so likely how come we can't find an instance of this involving a chl holder when they have been out there on a shall issue basis for twenty years?
So an event that is taking place in your imagination is more compelling than hard data from the real world?
I'll answer that - YES IT IS!! Because we have allowed it to happen.
Employers always start with "safe environment" when they justify victim disarmament. We have to stop letting them get away with this lie. Experience tells us, as well as common sense, that unarmed victims are preferred by violent criminals.
Although it seems like an obvious point,
recent comprehensive research has confirmed that criminals tend
to avoid assaulting, raping or attempting to murder people whom
the criminals think might be armed. See John R. Lott, Jr., "More
Guns, Less Crime: Understanding Crime and Gun Control Laws"
(University of Chicago Press, 1998).
Aaron Zelman Open letter to from JPFO site.
Last edited: