Documents forged? content 100% accurate

Status
Not open for further replies.

bountyh

Moderator
According to the woman who worked as the secretary of Bush's commanding officer (Marian Carr Knox). She says the content of the memos is exactly what the CO said and wrote down about the events of the time.


Knox says she didn’t type these memos, but she says she did type ones that contained the same information.

“Did or did not Lt. Bush take a physical as ordered by Col. Killian,” Rather asks Knox.
“The last time, no he didn’t,” says Knox. “It was a big no-no to not follow orders. And I can’t remember anyone refusing to. Now for instance, with the physical, every officer knew that before his birthday he was supposed to have that flying physical. Once in a while they might be late, but there would be a good excuse for it and let the commander know and try to set up a date for a make-up. If they did not take that physical, they were off flying status until they did.”


Did Knox ever hear Killian talk about this, or did he write memos about Bush not taking the physical?

“He was upset about it. That was one of the reasons why he wrote a memo directing him to go take the physical,” says Knox. “I’m going to say this, but it seems to me that Bush felt that he was above reproach.”



Knox says that Killian started what she calls a "cover-your-back" file -- a personal file where he stored the memos about the problems with Mr. Bush's performance, his failure to take a physical, and the pressure Killian felt from upstairs.

She addressed one memo, and a reference to retired Gen. Staudt pushing for a positive officer training report on Lt. Bush.

"’Staudt is pushing to sugar coat it.’ Does that sound like Col. Killian? Is that the way it felt,” Rather asked Knox.

“That's absolutely the way he felt about that," says Knox.


http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/09/15/60II/main643768.shtml



For The Record: Bush Documents

Sept. 15, 2004



Questioning Memos' Accuracy

Marian Carr Knox, the secretary to President Bush's National Guard commander, tells her story to Dan Rather. (Photo: CBS)

Knox remembers then-Lt. Bush well, and saw him often as he showed up for weekend training in 1971 and 1972. (Photo: AP / CBS)

(CBS) Last week, on 60 Minutes, we heard for the first time the full story from former Texas House Speaker Ben Barnes, who says he helped President George Bush get a highly coveted place in the National Guard.

60 Minutes also presented documents for the first time which indicated that once Mr. Bush was accepted into the Guard, he failed to live up to the requirements of his service, including following an order. And we also reported that the documents were written by then-Lt. Bush's National Guard squad commander, Lt. Col. Jerry Killian, who passed away in 1984.

In the past week, those documents have been subjected to extraordinary scrutiny and criticism.

Now, another voice - a credible voice - has entered the debate. Killian's secretary, Marian Carr Knox, describes herself as Killian's "right hand" during much of the 1970s.

She flew to New York Wednesday afternoon to tell 60 Minutes that she believes the documents we obtained are not authentic.

But there's yet another confusing twist to this story. She told Correspondent Dan Rather that she believes what the documents actually say is exactly as we reported. Knox is 86 years old, and completely comfortable in the eye of a storm. She spent more than two decades keeping pilots and officers in line at Ellington Air Force Base in Houston. Now, she wants to set the record straight about the memos that CBS News obtained.

Knox says she didn’t type these memos, but she says she did type ones that contained the same information.

“I know that I didn’t type them," says Knox. "However, the information in those is correct.”

Knox says the information in the four memos that CBS obtained is very familiar, but she doesn't believe the memos are authentic. She does, however, remember Killian being upset over Mr. Bush's failure to take a physical.

“Did or did not Lt. Bush take a physical as ordered by Col. Killian,” Rather asks Knox.
“The last time, no he didn’t,” says Knox. “It was a big no-no to not follow orders. And I can’t remember anyone refusing to. Now for instance, with the physical, every officer knew that before his birthday he was supposed to have that flying physical. Once in a while they might be late, but there would be a good excuse for it and let the commander know and try to set up a date for a make-up. If they did not take that physical, they were off flying status until they did.”

Did Knox ever hear Killian talk about this, or did he write memos about Bush not taking the physical?

“He was upset about it. That was one of the reasons why he wrote a memo directing him to go take the physical,” says Knox. “I’m going to say this, but it seems to me that Bush felt that he was above reproach.” Knox remembers Lt. Bush well, and saw him often as he showed up for weekend training in 1971 and 1972.

“He was always very gentlemanly. He called me by the name of his father’s secretary. He was always apologizing about that,” recalls Knox. “He couldn’t remember my name. I felt that his parents must have been wonderful to have produced somebody as nice as that.”

But did Lt. Bush get into the National Guard on the basis of preferential treatment?

“I'm going to say that he did,” says Knox. “I feel that he did, because there were a lot other boys in there in the same way."

So what kind of officer was Lt. Bush?

“Bush seemed to be having a good time. He didn't seem to be having any problem with the other pilots,” says Knox. “But, his time there, it seemed that the other fellows were, I’m going to say this, sort of resentful of him because of his attitude … that he really didn’t have to go by the rules.”

Knox says that Killian started what she calls a "cover-your-back" file -- a personal file where he stored the memos about the problems with Mr. Bush's performance, his failure to take a physical, and the pressure Killian felt from upstairs.

She addressed one memo, and a reference to retired Gen. Staudt pushing for a positive officer training report on Lt. Bush.

"’Staudt is pushing to sugar coat it.’ Does that sound like Col. Killian? Is that the way it felt,” Rather asked Knox.

“That's absolutely the way he felt about that," says Knox.

She also talked about another memo which she doesn’t believe is authentic -- but she says the facts behind it are very real.

“It's just like a personal journal,” says Knox. “You write things. It was more or less that.”

“These memos were not memos that you typed, and you don’t think they came directly out of his files,” Rather asked Knox.

“The information, yes,” says Knox. “It seems that somebody did see those memos, and then tried to reproduce and maybe changed them enough so that he wouldn’t get in trouble over it.” Knox says the fact that then-Lt. Bush was repeatedly missing drills was not lost on his fellow pilots.

“They missed him. It was sort of gossip around there, and they'd [the other officers would] snicker and so forth about what he was getting away with,” says Knox. “I guess there was even a resentment."

She told 60 Minutes again and again that she believed Lt. Bush refused a direct order to take a physical.

“Col. Killian’s son says that this isn’t true,” says Rather.

"He has no way of knowing whether that is true or not," says Knox.

Knox says that working in a senate campaign in 1972 became more important to Mr. Bush than flying for the Guard.

"I think it is plain and simple. Bush didn't think that he had to go by the rules that others did,” says Knox.

"He had this campaign to take care of, and that's what he was going to do -- and that's what he did do.”60 Minutes will continue to aggressively investigate the story of President Bush's service in the National Guard -- and the story of the documents and memos in Col. Killian's file.

Are those documents authentic, as experts consulted by CBS News continue to maintain? Or were they forgeries or re-creations, as Knox and many others believe?

We will keep an open mind and we will continue to report credible evidence and responsible points of view as we try to answer the questions raised about the authenticity of the documents.

Having said that, 60 Minutes feels that it's important to underscore this point: Those who have criticized aspects of our story have never criticized the major thrust of our report -- that George Bush received preferential treatment to get into the National Guard, and once accepted, failed to satisfy the requirements of his service. If we uncover any information to the contrary, that information will also be reported.
 
Those who have criticized aspects of our story have never criticized the major thrust of our report -- that George Bush received preferential treatment to get into the National Guard,


This is news? :confused:

and once accepted, failed to satisfy the requirements of his service.


The records have been released. Bush was not AWOL. That he was not the most repsponsible person at this stage of his life is hardly news. Missing a physical is not acceptable, but refusing an order is grounds for disciplinary action. Why was none ever initiated? Because a retired general prevented it?

If we uncover any information to the contrary, that information will also be reported.


And the reason we would believe CBS would be....

What?
 
That's hilarious.
lol.gif


So if I counterfeit a $100 bill (and it's "100%" accurate), and I foist it on a cashier, then you and CBS will come to my defense, right?

I have to say that watching the numbhead leftists that I despise come apart at the seams has been entertaining to say the least. I can't remember laughing so hard and so long as I've had occassion to this summer.

Last night when I heard a guy suggest - on Tony Snow's radio show - that these "documents" were some of the ones stuffed down Sandy Berger's pants, I almost drove off the road!

You guys are great! Keep up the good work! All you need now is a little tiny car, some elephants, and a Kaliope! :p
 
OTOH, the wife of Bush's Commanding Officer and the Son of Bush's Commanding Officer DO refute the content of the document. They say the CO thought highly of Bush.

Why would he say that to his family if he really didn't? If Bush was a slacker who was AWOL?

Back to he said, she said. (Except only 'right wing media' are covering those who disagree with the content.)

And then you still have the problem with CBS initially supporting the authenticity of the document, as opposed to just its content.

So who forged this document? And why did they forge it? Who is resorting to forgery to attack the President? The Kerry campaign? CBS? Some nut job who "sold" it to CBS?
 
Earth to Dan: You are lying! Call them "recreated" all you want, you are committing fraud by using fake documents and are destroying the Kerry campaign in the process.

Big Media, CBS, ABC, NBC, has zero credibility left. Thank goodness!
 
Earth to Dan: You are lying! Call them "recreated" all you want, you are committing fraud by using fake documents and are destroying the Kerry campaign in the process.
And Senator Hitlery is laughing her medusa head off. Suckers!
 
Yup. There has been no miscalculation in the Kerry campaign. Those Clintonites are doing just exactly what they were sent there to do - make sure Kerry goes down.
 
Dan rather not

When it came time to be a man and admit that his Bush bashing campaign was based on phony "documents", Dan rather not! Instead, after stonewalling for days about the National Guard documents being authentic, Dan & CBS declared that although the documents may not be authentic, the substance of what they contained was "accurate". Give me a break! The only reason CBS arrived at this point is that the Washington Post, New York Times, AP, and others that are not exactly bastions of conservatism destroyed the authenticity of the documents on several substantive bases, and the experts that CBS claimed had authenticated the documents denied those claims. The only thing good about this mess is that CBS has wantonly squandered whatever slight amount of credibility it had left.
 
"I think it is plain and simple. Bush didn't think that he had to go by the rules that others did,” says Knox.
Being a former military type person speaking from experience, Bush was not thinking he didn't have to go by the rules that others did. He was getting away with as much as he could. We always bent the rules as much as possible until we went a little too far and and were brought back to the straight and narrow.
Dan & CBS declared that although the documents may not be authentic, the substance of what they contained was "accurate".
You have to give the democrats credit for audacity. Not only can they tell the intent of a voter by looking at dimples on chads, they can get "accurate substance" from forged documents.
 
Being a former military type person speaking from experience, Bush was not thinking he didn't have to go by the rules that others did. He was getting away with as much as he could. We always bent the rules as much as possible until we went a little too far and and were brought back to the straight and narrow.
Yep. And Rather would know that if he had real military experience.

He has been known to make the claim of being a Marine, problem is he washed out of basic training. Of course a quick call to a Kinko's in Texas might be able to patch that problem up for him. LMAO


Documents forged? As we say in the U.S.N., ****ing-A!
 
My guess is that before they ran the first story about the documents they talked Marian Carr Knox (paid her off) into "coming forward" to verify the story that they fabricated and forged into these documents in the next 60 minutes episode or whatever. Unfortunately the person they put in charge of forging the docs was an idiot and they got caught. So, they spun it like any good liberal media outlet would've. They replaced their Marian Carr Knox "Yes indeed I did type those memos" story with the "Those aren't the actual documents I typed, but what they say is true" story.
 
Well, come on, Fred, if you passed a counterfeit $100 bill only because you knew you really did have $100 in the bank (or, at the very least, a buddy who owed you $100) is that really a crime?

Oh, wait, that's right--it sure is. :rolleyes:
 
Quartus,

I am not one to assume malice when stupidity will suffice, but I must say that Kerry's stumbling in front of the train (memos and sudden vocal embrace of gun control) shortly after longtime Clinton staffers showed up in his camp is highly suspicious. If toxicology says the bum that fell off the crowded platform onto the tracks was sober, then the question arises: "Was he pushed?" :eek:

Meanwhile, expect Hillary to be a model moderate Democrat senator for the next four years, only bucking the Repubs when it will make her look strong for key contituencies...
 
The left still wants to know...'yes or no, are the details alleged in the forged documents true or false?
We demand that President Bush answer'! It is to laugh!
I am truly amazed to see this in my lifetime, first the fall of Euro-Communism and the Berlin Wall, now the implosion of the left in this country led by a haggard, morally obtuse half wit hack and his lackeys in the sycophant, socialist media.

This has Carville and Begala written all over it and is certainly a prepatory coup. Do away with the last vestiges of the Kennedy wing of the party and re-establish the Clintons and their ilk as the new left regime.

And they say that it's the Republicans that slaughter their own...unholy geebus, they don't hold a candle to what's been done to Kerry. The Clintons shoulda just shot the bastard, like Vince Foster. It woulda been more merciful.
 
The Clintons shoulda just shot the bastard, like Vince Foster. It woulda been more merciful.
Considering the men and women that John "Victor Charlie" Kerry betrayed, and how he betrayed them, this slow death by the hands of his own comrades is much, much, much sweeter.


What goes around comes around Johnny Boy.
 
"So, they spun it like any good liberal media outlet would've. They replaced their Marian Carr Knox "Yes indeed I did type those memos" story with the "Those aren't the actual documents I typed, but what they say is true" story."

Question:

If this is a Knox-Rather conspiracy, there is a problem: why would she make claims that can (if false) be refuted by dozens of people?

1) Bush did not attend all of his drills as he was supposed to.

2) His arrogance was resented by the other pilots because of it.


If you are setting up a lie, you NEVER use one that a dozen people can testify is false:

So, where are the pilots from Bush's Alabama air group who would have seen him every month at the drills (if he was there) and who should right about now be standing up to set the record straight about Ms Knox's "lies"?

Please explain how this "conspiracy" would work if Ms Knox actually was lying for money.....
 
"We demand that President Bush answer'! It is to laugh!"

Why would they want an answer? He wouldn't tell the truth if it crawled up his butt and tried to kick it's way out through his teeth.
 
"Forgery is forgery. Red Herring."

So if the charges he lied and failed to fulfill his Guard duty are true, we can ignore them if the source the information came from is not the one printed on the page?

May God help us all.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top