Check this thread
http://www.rugerforum.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?t=50939
or, if the link does not work paste this into your web browser
rugerforum.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?t=50939
One thing mentioned on the Rugerforum, not mentioned here yet is that fact that you can refer to the firearm in mixed company without raising eyebrows. Example, mixed civilians and bad guys when you are out with your spouse. A reference out loud to "Billie" might raise an eyebrow. A reference to "The 45" might raise front sights.
Tactical code words aside, my names for my guns are pretty pedestrian. 4" GP, SuperRed, Bull Barrel (22 rimfire Ruger Mark II). But then I am not that sentimental in naming conventions, but am sentimental to inanimate objects. Maybe that's aberrant of me. I got sad when my Dan Wesson .357 got wet travelling cross-country and by the time I found out, the finish was ruined with a patina of rust.
Guns are tools, nothing more, really, but I do have a Colt Semi-auto that belonged to my Uncle. I attach sentiment to that gun, but I have not felt any urge to name it.
On the other hand, I have a guitar that was named by a group of my brother's friends (he bought it for me when he was travelling in Europe with a foreign exchange group). I kept the name. I dunno why.
What's in a name? A rose by any other name would smell as sweet. (W. Shakespeare, Romeo and Juliet).
I disagree. A name allows a "special" relationship to be shorthandedly identified. A name allows code to be passed when tactically necessary. A name allows specific identification (How many of us have more than one identical gun that we would like to differentiate from each other?). A name facilitates affection (Happiness is a warm gun,J. Lennon/P. McCartney, White Album,). But I never understood that song. Sometimes it is just humor.
To each their own.
Lost Sheep