Do You Carry At Home?

Status
Not open for further replies.
According to the official record Komisarjevsky and Hayes got into the house through an unlocked basement door and nobody knew they were there until they assaulted Mr. Petit.

That's the truth. That's what we know happened and anything else is nothing more than speculation designed to prove our side of the argument.

I don't know if a locked door would have stopped Komisarjevsky and Hayes.

I do know the Petits wouldn't have been worse off.

I have no idea if Mr. Petit had a gun in the house. I don't know if he could have got to it in time if he did. I don't know any of the gazillion things that could have happened if that door was locked but I can say with absolute certainty that it wouldn't have been worse.

I don't know what good a gun would have done Mr Petit even if he had it on him because he woke up in the middle of an assault.

I said it in my beginning post I don't actually wear a gun at home most of the time. I do have my doors and windows locked all the time unless I'm actually using them. I don't have windows open in my house unless I'm actually in the room.

Maybe a locked door wouldn't have stopped Komisarjevsky and Hayes but if they tried kicking my door down I'm positive I would have had ample time to take cover and prepare to defend my home.

I have a gun on me or at arm's length all the time but it still The Last Resort
 
Moonglum said:
I don't know if a locked door would have stopped Komisarjevsky and Hayes.

I do know the Petits wouldn't have been worse off.
Click to expand...
You started this thread with a question. Why are you arguing with people who answer you? I never said the Petits would have been worse off if they had locked the door, or if they had an alarm. I only mentioned the Petit incident to counter the notion that it's not necessary to carry at home if you live in a "good" area -- the underlying premise being that bad things don't happen in "good" areas. Although the odds against bad things happening in "good" areas are better than in "bad" areas, the likelihood is not zero.

I live in a suburb that's considered a "good" area. When I was growing up here we never locked the car doors, and in the summer we left the front door open at night so the breeze could blow through the screen door.

Those days are long gone. This town has now seen home invasions. Cars have been broken into while parked in closed and locked garages. My house was burgled in 1997. It's the oldest and smallest house in the neighborhood. So why was I picked? It was the only house in the neighborhood that didn't have an alarm system.

I now have an alarm system. And I carry at home. Not 100% of the time, but most.

It's a personal choice as to how each person views the odds, and chooses to respond to whatever he or she thinks the odds are.
 
Our Town House is one end of a block of 5 homes. The Jeep is a house car!
Never is left outside. To gain entry, a lot of noise would be generated.
My wife sleeps like a log! She is doing that right now, I am on the laptop.

My loaded G19 is 3M behind me, on the bedside table, plus my Surefire light.
Just changed that, went to check the thermostat, G19 and Cell phone in my old Canadian imported dressing gown, I was told you will not need that in Florida?
Oh no?

Dressed in Track pants and shirt, G19 in the right pocket, phone in left. So yes I am armed in the house. Showered, dressed, holstered G19, spare G17 magazine, Surefire, and razor-sharp Benchmade folding knife. The model with a window breaker and seat belt cutter.

Do I live in a sketchy part of town? No, but my wife was targeted by two young chaps, pants hanging down hoods, while shopping, she disturbed my book reading self outside, in the parking lot. (Cell phones) With that information, I met her when she walked by the Jeep, (did I mention it was a much-decorated Security vehicle that I was leaning against?) they hung on to their pants as they ran to the main road. I think I was leaning against their prospective ride!

Most of these 3 pages speak to situation awareness, as much as carrying a gun.
 
On 2/15/2016 My Mothers Home Was Broken In To .They Smashed The Side Window With A Rock Gained Entry . My Mom Was 92 Years OLD They DUCK TAPED .HER FEET , HANDS AND MOUTH ,Covered her up in bed .And left She (DIED) .Her Name Was Amelia Roman .Lived In North Braddock Pennsylvania .They Are Still Looking For The MURDERS
 
.... but I know a lot more than you probably saw in a docudrama.
Click to expand...

I do not base my opinion of violent predatory criminals and crime in general on what I saw in 15 minutes of a docu-drama. The show simply offered a few tid bids of info which stood in support of what I already suspected.

I don't know if I have "unique" knowledge
Click to expand...

Then where does the absoluteness of your statement come from?
 
Never Mind
Click to expand...

LOL, I feel your pain Bro

There are always going to be people who narrowly focus on a reactive posture and waltz right past any real efforts to mitigate the undesired condition to begin with. I have never seen so much resistance to simply helping yourself with a robust and locked entry way. Every second you can afford yourself is worth a kilderkin full of gold and may very well save your life.

A secure perimeter , barriers(locks, doors) and general access control are very basic elements to security which has been around for thousands of years. Its why people built fortifications around their encampment rather than practice sleeping in a swordbelt and calling it "all good".

I have always had a firearm readily available to be in hand in a matter of 10 seconds but I simply elect to work actively towards keeping badguy out to begin with or at least making it one huge headache to get inside. Of course now a days I am retired and have at least 3 other men ( or more in the growing season) on the property at any given time. If evil finds me at home, I should have plenty of help to address it.

As I have said before, I had a couple of guys try to break into one of my equipment sheds which stands about 100 yards from the main residence. They jacked up the steel door pretty good but they gave up and left. I have them on clearly on video ( well, hidden game camera) but was never able to ID them. Good doors and jambs can go a long way but of course it will not keep a determined criminal out for very long.
 
There is no reason why having good locks and secured entryways has to be mutually exclusive with carrying in a home. A person could do both if they wanted to, or they could do just one or the other. Personally I want good locks and physical security at any dwelling where I live.

As for good vs. bad areas, yes it is certainly possible that bad things happen in good areas. Possible and probable are not the same. I could drown when I’m not on a lake or an ocean. But I wear a life jacket when I’m on a body of water and not when I’m around a pool. I look at the probability of an outcome and make judgements based on that. For me personally does that change where I do or don’t carry? Not generally, but I can still acknowledge that crime rates vary by locality. If someone wants to change their security posture based on the threat probability that’s their call (like much of this thread in the first place).


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:
There are always going to be people who narrowly focus on a reactive posture and waltz right past any real efforts to mitigate the undesired condition to begin with. I have never seen so much resistance to simply helping yourself with a robust and locked entry way. Every second you can afford yourself is worth a kilderkin full of gold and may very well save your life.
Click to expand...
1. Let's see some quotes from this thread which are resistant to the idea that good doors and locks are an important part of a good security posture.

2. Where are the posts from this thread indicating that people should narrowly focus on reactive posture?

3. Who on this thread has posted that delaying a forced entry with physical security measures is not important?

The biggest problem with this topic is that people can't just have a discussion on the basis of what is actually posted. Instead, there tend to be a lot of assumptions made about what the other side is thinking/saying/feeling and that colors the discussion in ways it really shouldn't.
 
Brother.. if you do not sense the seemingly dismissive attitude toward much of what has been said in regards to keeping the badguys out, thats fine but im not going to diagram the sentences. Its just the vibe that I get when I read several of the posts here. I didnt use the word seemingly when I described what I see as "resistance" and perhaps I should have. I cant say for sure what someone means, only what I think it means or conveys (to me).

If a persons plan is essentially pulling a pistol out of their pocket when a troop of badguy suddenly appear in the home, that is not very "proactive" in my estimation. Proactive would be the efforts which start well ahead of the worst case scenario. At least in my view anyway.
 
FireForged said:
If a persons plan is essentially pulling a pistol out of their pocket when a troop of badguy suddenly appear in the home, that is not very "proactive" in my estimation.
Click to expand...

I’m looking in this thread trying to find someone suggesting this, that their sole plan is to fight the attackers once they have entered the home and that they have no concern for exterior defenses. I can’t seem to find it. I have seen people suggest that exterior defenses can be defeated and that determined attackers may be able to get passed those (and we can argue the likelihood of that). I don’t mind a little hyperbole for stylistic flair, but at a certain point you’re constructing a straw man argument.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
I find it annoying to have to go look for a gun when I'm taking my little dogs outside to pee and poo {lots of predators around} so it's pretty rare for me to not be wearing a gun. Most of the time it's either a Walther P22{uses the same holster as my 1911} or a S&W mp22 compact{same holster as a Glock 19}. The logic being if I decide to go into town I can easily substitute either one for a bigger gun without messing with the holsters.....or not.
 
Proactive would be the efforts which start well ahead of the worst case scenario. At least in my view anyway.
Click to expand...
I agree entirely. I really don't see that anyone has stated that they disagree with that philosophy on this thread.
I have seen people suggest that exterior defenses can be defeated and that determined attackers may be able to get passed those (and we can argue the likelihood of that).
Click to expand...
Correct.

As far as likelihood goes, there are different schools of thought.

If the odds of an occurrence are all that matters, then nobody would ever buy lottery tickets. But they do. Not because they believe that they have a good chance of winning, but rather because they are swayed by the size of the potential windfall. These folks would say--yes, I know my odds of winning are very small, and I know I probably won't win, but someone wins almost every time they have a drawing. And winning would be a life-changing experience!

I think the same thing applies to this topic, but in reverse. I fully expect that I will never be faced with a home invasion. I think there is a very good chance I will live my entire life and never be the victim of a violent crime given my lifestyle, the areas I frequent and the precautions I take.

So why do I bother to carry a gun? It's not because of the odds, it's because of the stakes. In the very unlikely event I were to be faced with the prospect of needing a gun, the ramifications of not having one could be unthinkable. Like the opposite of a lottery jackpot. Instead of becoming an instant millionaire, I could lose everything in an instant and potentially in ways that do not even bear thinking about. So, I prepare--because being prepared is better than not being prepared.

Do I do absolutely everything I can to make my house more secure? No, of course not. I don't have bars on the windows, I don't have a large dog. I don't currently have cameras integrated into my security system. I don't pay anyone to patrol the premises.

Reality means that people have to prioritize the level of expense and effort they put into securing their house and, undoubtedly, if you pick any two people, even in similar circumstances, they will have different approaches to establishing their priorities.

Which one is right? Well, of course, the one who has a priority list most similar to mine! The other one is obviously crazy for living "that way". :D
 
JohnKSa
If the odds of an occurrence are all that matters, then nobody would ever buy lottery tickets.
Click to expand...
It's not because of the odds, it's because of the stakes.
Click to expand...

I am going to steal those two paragraphs and use them any and every time someone asks me why I carry. I'll try to remember to give you credit.
 
If as a parent if you had an adult child who ALWAYS carried a razor sharp dirk or dagger on their person to "defend themselves" would you tend to get a little worried about that individual? I mean, assuming they don't live in Mozambique or similar?
 
zoo said:
If as a parent if you had an adult child who ALWAYS carried a razor sharp dirk or dagger on their person to "defend themselves" would you tend to get a little worried about that individual? I mean, assuming they don't live in Mozambique or similar?
Click to expand...
Usually these discussions devolve into casting aspersions on the character and morals of others, and now this one has as well. I posted earlier on my reasons - secure control of a loaded firearm, immediate access in time of need, & I don’t know the future and bad things happen in good neighborhoods.

If someone wants to guarantee my safety and well being in writing by binding contract and assume the associated financial burdens, I’ll be glad to accept that person’s guidance and judgment. Until then, you don’t know anything about me or my circumstances so your opinion and advice is worth every penny I’ve paid for it.
 
Usually these discussions devolve into casting aspersions on the character and morals of others, and now this one has as well.
Click to expand...

I only asked a question. No offense intended. Not sure what to make out of your response other than to say you appear very sensitive as to your choice to pack at home. Would you like a back rub? Hey, do your kids carry?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top