Here's my copy of the exeption in FL law; correct me if its wrong and, if so, provide a link to the proper text.
Disney probably uses, stores and transports more explosive material than every other federal licensee in the state combined. By that section alone, I think Disney is covered. But the definition continues:
At a minimum, Disney obtained a license to engage in the act of dealing, but I would not be surprised if they do some manufacturing and quite possibly direct importing of explosive material. The act of merely receiving explosive material in interstate commerce and/or otherwise disposing of that explosive material constitutes dealing and requires a federal license.
Furthermore, while the act does prohibit an employer from searching a vehicle specifically for firearms, Disney could retain the right to search the vehicle for other reasons as a condition of employment (drugs, explosives, anything unrelated to firearms, or even no reason at all). By refusing a general search, not related to firearms, he could have violated the terms of his employment agreement to allow a search for other materials.
(e) Property owned or leased by a public or private employer or the landlord of a public or private employer upon which the primary business conducted is the manufacture, use, storage, or transportation of combustible or explosive materials regulated under state or federal law,
Disney probably uses, stores and transports more explosive material than every other federal licensee in the state combined. By that section alone, I think Disney is covered. But the definition continues:
OR property owned or leased by an employer who has obtained a permit required under 18 U.S.C. s. 842 to engage in the business of importing, manufacturing, or dealing in explosive materials on such property
At a minimum, Disney obtained a license to engage in the act of dealing, but I would not be surprised if they do some manufacturing and quite possibly direct importing of explosive material. The act of merely receiving explosive material in interstate commerce and/or otherwise disposing of that explosive material constitutes dealing and requires a federal license.
Furthermore, while the act does prohibit an employer from searching a vehicle specifically for firearms, Disney could retain the right to search the vehicle for other reasons as a condition of employment (drugs, explosives, anything unrelated to firearms, or even no reason at all). By refusing a general search, not related to firearms, he could have violated the terms of his employment agreement to allow a search for other materials.