It might be a generational thing. When I was growing up, I learned my guns. There were no shortcuts. I understood the obligation to maintain the machine, and the grave responsibility of owning it. Nowadays, people don't care. They want things cheap and easy, even when it comes to weapons.Ease of dissasembly... Put a 1911 in a "virgin's hands" and tell them to take it apart and wipe it down with oil....good luck.
If they're only putting 50% on paper, they really need training, and they shouldn't even consider using the gun for self-defense until they get it.most of these people were at the range and know that 5-6 shots just isn't going to cut it when they only put 50% on paper.
Of course, that's not the way it works out, and it really worries me. I see the same things you do on a regular basis. This paraphrases conversations I've had all too many times:
"Some guy looked at me weird in the parking lot, and I got scared. I need a gun. My buddy who knows a guy who used to play poker with a cop said to get a Glock. Training? I don't have time for that. Give me the cheapest holster you've got, too. Oh, and I don't need defensive ammunition, just give me the cheap stuff. So what if I keep sweeping you with it? It's not loaded, right?"
Now, is this Gaston Glock's fault? Of course not. Nor is it an indictment of the gun. They're good guns. However, they're not for guys like the one in the above paragraph. They require training and discipline to use safely.
I see it as a catch-22: many of the people seeking them would be better served by a rimfire or a revolver, but there's no telling them that.